Answer:
We cannot infer at the 10% significance level that the assumption of ski centers is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis for this question can be stated as
Null hypothesis H0: =4
Alternate hypothesis Ha:
The test is two tailed
Standard Deviation –
= 2
z=(4.84-4)/(2/sqrt(63))
=3.33
Z(0.1/2)=1.645 is less than Z =3.334
Hence, we will reject H0
Hence, the average growth skier ski’s four times a year is not true
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x be the number of designer T shirts.
To break even,
Total Cost = Total Sales
Fixed Cost + Variable Cost = Total Sales
given the promotional advertising is classified under fixed cost,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23882/23882983d61c6f3eaed490f44f84915c0ace94a9" alt="500 + 4.25x = 15x \\ 15x = 500 + 4.25x \\ 15x - 4.25x = 500 \\ 10.75x = 500 \\ x = 500 \div 10.75 \\ = 46.5 \\ = 47 \: (round \: off \: to \: nearest \: whole \: number)"
Here you go look at the drawings
C May be the answer sorry if it is wrong.