Answer:
High tides would be much smaller than they are now, and low tides would be even lower. This is because the sun would be influencing the tides, not the moon; however, the sun has a weaker pull, which would decrease the tides. ... Winds could become much faster and much stronger without the moon.
Explanation:
google
Answer:
No, not necessarily
Explanation:
If an object is moving with an acceleration that causes its speed to be reduced, there will be a moment in which it reaches v = 0, but this doesn't necessarily mean that the acceleration isn't acting anymore. If the object continues its movement with the same acceleration, it's velocity will become negative.
An example of an object that has zero velocity but non-zero acceleration:
If you throw an object in the air with a certain velocity, it will move vertically, reducing its velocity in a 9,8 
rate (which is the acceleration caused by gravity). At a certain point, the object will reach its maximum height, and will start to fall. In the exact moment that it reaches the maximum height, before it starts falling, its velocity is zero, but gravity is still acting on the object (this is the reason why it starts falling instead of just being stopped at that point). Therefore, at that point, the object has zero velocity but an acceleration of 9,8 .
The answer is B friction force
Acceleration = (change of speed) / (time for the change)
Change in speed = (22 - 4) = 18 m/s.
Time for the change = 3 sec.
Acceleration = 18/3 = 6 m/s per second.
Answer:
Explanation:
E₀ = 229.1 V/m
E = E₀ / √2 = 229.1 / 1.414 = 162 V/m
B = E / c ( c is velocity of em waves )
= 162 / (3 x 10⁸) = 54 x 10⁻⁸ T
rate of energy flow = ( E x B ) / μ₀
= 162 x 54 x 10⁻⁸ / 4π x 10⁻⁷
= 69.65 W per m².
