The statement “Only the “Conclusion” section discusses whether the original hypothesis was supported, and both sections suggest further research”, best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Answer: Option 4
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In research, we do experiments and derive the results. Then, those results were analyzed by us. In this analysis part, we compare our results with the related results published elsewhere. Also, we correlate the similarities and point out the differences between our analysis and other reported results.
In conclusion part, we have to check hypothesis or it supported. And, we summarise our analysis and figure out the further research need to be done on that to improvise our research. So, the final statement is the correct option which best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
The concentration of positive charge and mass in Rutherford's atomic model is called the nucleus. Rutherford's experiments involving the use of alpha particle beams directed onto thin metal foils demonstrated the existence of the nucleus. The nucleus of an atom contains positively charge particles called protons and other uncharged particles called neutrons. According to this model most volume of an atom is made up of an empty space.
Answer:
It's obviously <em><u>LIGHT</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>ENERGY</u></em><em><u> </u></em><u>for</u><u> </u><u>me</u><u> </u><u>cuz</u><u> </u><u>it's</u><u> </u><u>from</u><u> </u><u>the</u><u> </u><u>flashl</u><u>ight</u><u>.</u><u>.</u>
Explanation:
Hope it helps you..
Your welcome in advance..
(ㆁωㆁ)