Answer:
oxidation:Ti to Ti Reduction:O2 toO2
Explanation:
<em>oxidation loses electron while Reduction gains electron</em>
There will be chemical reaction(equation4Na+02--2Na20
Explanation:
Fossil fuel is an overall term for covered ignitable geologic stores of natural materials, framed from rotted plants and creatures that have been changed over to unrefined petroleum, coal, flammable gas, or weighty oils by introduction to warmth and weight in the world's outside more than a huge number of years.
The consuming of petroleum products by people is the biggest wellspring of emanations of carbon dioxide, which is one of the ozone depleting substances that permits radiative compelling and adds to an unnatural weather change.
A little bit of hydrocarbon-based powers are biofuels gotten from climatic carbon dioxide, and consequently don't build the net measure of carbon dioxide in the environment.
Answer:
b) The dehydrated sample absorbed moisture after heating
Explanation:
a) Strong initial heating caused some of the hydrate sample to splatter out.
This will result in a higher percent of water than the real one, because you assume in the calculation that the splattered sample was only water (which in not true).
b) The dehydrated sample absorbed moisture after heating.
Usually inorganic salts may absorbed moisture from the atmosphere so this will explain the 13% difference between calculated water percent the real content of water in the hydrate.
c) The amount of the hydrate sample used was too small.
It will create some errors but they do not create a difference of 13% difference as stated in the problem.
d) The crucible was not heated to constant mass before use.
Here the error is small.
e) Excess heating caused the dehydrated sample to decompose.
Usually the inorganic compounds are stable in the temperature range of this kind of experiments. If you have an organic compound which retain water molecules you may decompose the sample forming volatile compounds which will leave crucible so the error will be quite high.
