Answer:
No, there is no evidence that the manufacturer has a problem with underfilled or overfilled bottles, due that according our results we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
Explanation:
according to this exercise we have the following:
σ^2 =< 0.01 (null hypothesis)
σ^2 > 0.01 (alternative hypothesis)
To solve we can use the chi-square statistical test. To reject or not the hypothesis, we have that the rejection region X^2 > 30.14
Thus:
X^2 = ((n-1) * s^2)/σ^2 = ((20-1)*0.0153)/0.01 = 29.1
Since 29.1 < 30.14, we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
They had fresher breathe because their breathe may have been bad before.
Answer:
Carbon Tetrachloride
Explanation:
1 Carbon atom, 4 chlorine atoms (hence "tetra" prefix)
