Answer:
L = 41.09 Kg m2 / s The angular momentum does not depend on the time
Explanation:
The definition of angular momentum is
L = r x p
Where blacks indicate vectors
Let's apply this definition our case. Linear momentum
p = m v
Let's replace
L = m r x v
The given function is
x = 6.00 i ^ + 4.15 t j
^
We look for speed
v = dx / dt
v = 0 + 4.15 j ^
To evaluate the angular momentum one of the best ways is to use determinants
![L = m \left[\begin{array}{ccc}i&j&k\\6&4.15t&0\\0&4.15&0\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=L%20%3D%20m%20%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7Di%26j%26k%5C%5C6%264.15t%260%5C%5C0%264.15%260%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
L = m 6 4.15 k ^
The other products give zero
Let's calculate
L = 1.65 6 4.15 k ^
L = 41.09 Kg m2 / s
The angular momentum does not depend on the time
Answer:
It appears to rise and set because of the Earth's rotation on its axis. It makes one complete turn every 24 hours. It turns toward the east. As the Earth rotates toward the east, it looks like the sun is moving west.
Explanation:
Answer:
The paper focuses on the biology of stress and resilience and their biomarkers in humans from the system science perspective. A stressor pushes the physiological system away from its baseline state toward a lower utility state. The physiological system may return toward the original state in one attractor basin but may be shifted to a state in another, lower utility attractor basin. While some physiological changes induced by stressors may benefit health, there is often a chronic wear and tear cost due to implementing changes to enable the return of the system to its baseline state and maintain itself in the high utility baseline attractor basin following repeated perturbations. This cost, also called allostatic load, is the utility reduction associated with both a change in state and with alterations in the attractor basin that affect system responses following future perturbations. This added cost can increase the time course of the return to baseline or the likelihood of moving into a different attractor basin following a perturbation. Opposite to this is the system's resilience which influences its ability to return to the high utility attractor basin following a perturbation by increasing the likelihood and/or speed of returning to the baseline state following a stressor. This review paper is a qualitative systematic review; it covers areas most relevant for moving the stress and resilience field forward from a more quantitative and neuroscientific perspective.
Explanation:
