<u>Answer:</u> The correct answer is Option b.
<u>Explanation:</u>
To calculate the amount of heat absorbed or released, we use the following equation:
.....(1)
where, q = amount of heat absorbed or released.
m = mass of the substance
c = heat capacity of water = 4.186 J/g ° C
= Change in temperature
We are given:
![m=30g\\\Delta T=[40-0]^oC=40^oC\\q=?J](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=m%3D30g%5C%5C%5CDelta%20T%3D%5B40-0%5D%5EoC%3D40%5EoC%5C%5Cq%3D%3FJ)
Putting values in equation 1, we get:

q = 5023.2 J
We are given:
![m=40g\\\Delta T=[40-30]^oC=10^oC\\q=?J](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=m%3D40g%5C%5C%5CDelta%20T%3D%5B40-30%5D%5EoC%3D10%5EoC%5C%5Cq%3D%3FJ)
Putting values in equation 1, we get:

q = 1674.4 J
Heat gained by Trial 1 than trial 2 = 
Hence, the amount of heat gained in Trial 1 about 3347 J more than the heat released in Trial 2.
Thus, the correct answer is Option b.
Answer:
Identical
Explanation:
Both compounds are identical. If you rotate the compound on the left 60 degree anticlockwise you will get the compound on the right.
These are not isomers of each other because they have same structural and molecular formulas.
Also, they are related to each other because they are the same
This problem is requiring the empirical formula for CaCO₃, which is its molecular formula, and turns out to be equal, this is A. CaCO3 according to the following:
<h3>Empirical formulas:</h3><h3 />
In chemistry, molecular formulas show both the actual type and number of atoms in a chemical compound, based on the elements across the periodic table and the subscripts standing for the number of atoms in the compound.
However, the empirical formula is a reduced expression of the molecular one, which shows the minimum number of atoms in a compound after simplifying to the smallest whole numbers.
In such a way, since the given compound is CaCO₃ and both Ca and C have a one as their subscript, it is not possible to simplify any further and therefore the empirical formula equals the molecular one this time, making the answer to be A. CaCO3.
Learn more about empirical formulas: brainly.com/question/1247523
Answer:
I think it's commensalism
Explanation:
False because I think it’s supposed to be photoheteroterotrophs