All categories

3 years ago

What are some of the physical benefits to be derived from aerobic

Physics

1 answer:

VladimirAG [237]3 years ago

6 0

Some of the benefits are increased heart muscles, increase in blood flow, and reduced body fat

You might be interested in

An object is made of glass and has the shape of a cube 0.13 m on a side, according to an observer at rest relative to it. Howeve

Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

$v=0.9833\ c$

Explanation:

The density changes means that the length in the direction of the motion is changed.

Therefore,

$\text{Density} = \frac{m}{lwh}$

Given :

Side, b = h = 0.13 m

Mass, m = 3.3 kg

Density = 8100 $kg/m^3$

So,

$8100=\frac{3.3}{l \times 0.13 \times 0.13}$

$l=\frac{3.3}{8100 \times 0.13 \times 0.13}$

l = 0.024 m

Then for relativistic length contraction,

$l= l' \sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}$

$0.024= 0.13 \sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}$

$0.184= \sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}$

$0.033= 1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}$

$\frac{v^2}{c^2}= 0.967$

$\frac{v}{c}=0.9833$

$v=0.9833\ c$

Therefore, the speed of the observer relative to the cube is 0.9833 c (in the units of c).

3 0

3 years ago

THE PROBLEM!

Elodia [21]

Answer: 15.29

Explanation: there you go have a nice day (*^p^*)

3 0

2 years ago

4. The time it takes an object to rotate once is

pshichka [43]

Answer:

Explanation:

23.9344696 hours

3 0

3 years ago

How does a sound wave transfer energy to your ears ?

horrorfan [7]

Answer:

A. Particles in air move in circles as the wave moves forward.

B. Particles in air move forward but not backward as the wave moves

forward.

C. Particles in air move up and down as the wave moves forward.

✔ D. Particles in air move forward and backward as the wave moves

forward.

Explanation:

The waves transfer energy from the source of the sound, e.g. a drum, to its surroundings. Your ear detects sound waves when vibrating air particles cause your ear drum to vibrate. The bigger the vibrations the louder the sound.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Discuss the pros and cons of fission and fusion reactions.

Jet001 [13]

Fission: -

Pros:

- "It does not contribute to the air pollutants in the environment."

- "It does not need costly energy fuels."

- "It is capable of providing energy for 2 to 3 years."

- "It does not make global warming worse."

- "It produces a nuclear reaction that is important."

- "It helps with the field of astronomy."

Cons:

- "It can harm the environment in a way that it disposes waste."

- "It poses a risk to public health."

- "It can cause deadly and costly accidents."

- "It has the potential to open the door for terrorists to create powerful weapons."

Fusion Reactions: -

Pros:

- "Clean energy ."

- "Virtually limitless fuel available ."

- "No chain reaction. Easier to control or stop than fission ."

- "Nuclear fission is either a nuclear reaction or a radioactive decay process in which the nucleus of an atom splits into smaller parts (lighter nuclei) ."

- "Little or no nuclear waste. Core remains radioactive for only 100 years. Possibly radioactive structural elements ."

- "Very low fuel cost."

Cons:

- "Unproven (it will take another years of research to explore it on commercial scale) ."

- "Commercial power plants will be very expensive to build ."

- "Requires extremely high temperatures .

If cold fusion could be achieved, it would be much easier to implement."

8 0

3 years ago