An object with non-zero mass (even negligible mass is non-zero) will never reach the speed of light. Due to relativistic effects, each "unit" of acceleration becomes less effective at increasing your velocity (relative to some other object, of course) as your relative velocity approaches the speed of light.
And even if there was a way, If you would accelerate to the 99,99% of the speed light in just 1 second, you would experience a G-force of aprox. 30,600,000 g's which is enough to kill you in a few seconds
Answer:
Explanation:
Given
Distance to grandmother's house=100 mi
it is given that during return trip Julie spend equal time driving with speed 30 mph and 70 mph
Let Julie travel x mi with 30 mph and 100-x with 70 mph
x=30 mi
Therefore
Julie's Average speed on the way to Grandmother's house
=42 mph
On return trip
Answer:
<em>The 6000 lines per cm grating, will produces the greater dispersion .</em>
Explanation:
A diffraction grating is an optical component with a periodic (usually one that has ridges or rulings on their surface rather than dark lines) structure that splits and diffracts light into several beams travelling in different directions.
The directions of the light beam produced from a diffraction grating depend on the spacing of the grating, and also on the wavelength of the light.
For a plane diffraction grating, the angular positions of principle maxima is given by
(a + b) sin ∅n = nλ
where
a+b is the distance between two consecutive slits
n is the order of principal maxima
λ is the wavelength of the light
From the equation, we can see that without sin ∅ exceeding 1, increasing the number of lines per cm will lead to a decrease between the spacing between consecutive slits.
In this case, light of the same wavelength is used. If λ and n is held constant, then we'll see that reducing the distance between two consecutive slits (a + b) will lead to an increase in the angle of dispersion sin ∅. So long as the limit of sin ∅ not greater that one is maintained.
The inaccurate measurements must be similar to the other two measurements (ex; 590, 589, 599), but different from the actual volume of water. (Ex; the actual volume is let say.. 100, but you measured 50, 49, 40)
the focal length <span> is much more decent for a concave, and also worse</span><span> for a convex mirror. When the image that is given, distance is good and decent, images are always on the same area of the mirror as the object given , and it is not fake. images distance is </span>never positive <span>, the image is on the oppisite side of the mirror, so the image must be virtual.</span>
