All categories

2 years ago

Convert 3 hours 21 minutes to decimal hours.

Physics

1 answer:

Oxana [17]2 years ago

7 0

Total hours is 3.35 hours

Explanation:

Given:

convert 3 hours 21 minutes to decimal hours

We know:

1 hour = 60 minutes

and

1 minute = 60 seconds

1 minute = 1 / 60 hours

So,

21 minutes = $\frac{21}{60} hours$

= 0.35 hours

Total hours would be = 3 hours + 0.35 hours

= 3.35 hours

Therefore, total hours is 3.35 hours

You might be interested in

ANOTHER PHYSICS QUESTION PLEASE HELP!

Sergio039 [100]

Answer

= 60

Hope it helps:)

5 0

3 years ago

Suppose a ray of light traveling in a material with an index of refraction n a reaches an interface with a material having an in

KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer: C and D

Explanation: One of the first rule for total internal reflection to occur is that the ray must move from a dense to a less dense medium, hence refractive index of medium a must be greater than that of b.

When a ray moves from a dense to a less dense medium, the refracted ray moves away from the normal thus increasing the size of the angle of refraction (total internal refraction occurs when the angle of refraction is 90° and the angle of incidence at this point is known as the critical angle), hence the angle of incidence must be greater than the critical angle.

These points verifies option C and D

5 0

2 years ago

The diagram shows two charged objects, X and Y.

masya89 [10]

The missing diagram is in the attachments.

Answer: X: positive Y: positive

Explanation: Electric field is a vector quantity, which means it can be represented by a vector arrow: the arrow points in the direction of electric field and its length represents the magnitude at a given location. There are another representation of the electric field called electric field lines, in which the line points away from a positively charged source and towards a negatively charged source. This occurs because it follows a pattern, where the lines points in the direction that a positive test charge would have if it is accelerating on the line.

Analyzing the diagram, it can be observed that the lines are pointing away from both of the charged objects. Therefore, both X and Y are positively charged.

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In a compound microscope, the objective has a focal length of 1.0 cm, the eyepiece has a focal length of 2.0 cm, and the tube le

expeople1 [14]

Answer:

The value is $m \approx 310$

Explanation:

From the question we are told that

The focal length of the objective is $f_o = 1.0 \ cm$

The focal length of the eyepiece is $f_e = 2.0 \ cm$

The tube length is $L = 25 \ cm$

Generally the magnitude of the overall magnification is mathematically represented as

$m = m_o * m_e$

Where $m_o$ is the objective magnification which is mathematically represented as

$m_o = \frac{L}{f_o }$

=> $m_o = \frac{25}{1 }$

=> $m_o = 25$

$m_e$ is the eyepiece magnification which is mathematically evaluated as

$m_e = \frac{L }{f_e }$

$m_e = \frac{25 }{ 2}$

$m_e = 12.5 \ cm$

$m = 25 * 12.5$

$m \approx 310$

6 0

3 years ago

how is the position of electrons involved in metallic bonding different from the position of electrons that form ionic and coval

Yuri [45]

While ionic bonds join metals to nonmetals, and covalent bonds join nonmetals to nonmetals, metallic bonds are responsible for the bondingbetween metal atoms. In metallic bonds, the valence electrons from the s and p orbitals of the interacting metal atoms delocalize.

I hope that this answer helps you out

7 0

3 years ago