Decisions of the supreme court are extremely important because it sets boundaries for our country, and serves those who deserve it, justice. We as a nation, are sinful, and lack wisdom, but if we chose good, wise people to serve the country Justice, we can rest assured that we will be avenged. Though the supreme court does make flawed decisions - as we all do - they are people who work hard each day to bring our country justice; and for that they deserve much respect.
This is not all that the report should be, but I am not doing it for you. Use your head, and logical thinkin. What would it be like if we had no courts? Hopefully this can give you some pointers.
Answer:
In all of the four river valley civilizations, religion was one of the biggest contributors to shaping each and every civilization. Religious leaders would play a very big role in all of the river valley civilizations.
In China, people gained their governing rights by a mandate of heaven creating very long lines of dynasties until the common people of China decided that the dynasty had lost the favor of the Gods. But, in the Indus River Valley, the priests were referred as the head officials who had different amounts of authority. In Egypt, the pharaoh was seen as a God to the people and was then given his right as the supreme ruler in the eyes of the people.
Though in Sumer, the kingdoms were organized into city-states and the different Kings ruled each city-states for their gods. The kings were assisted by priests, nobles, and scribed. But before the kings came, the priests were the one who would rule over all of Sumer.
Explanation:
well those civilazations river valley all for farming in sumer they called did irrigation. they are the same too cause it helped for trade transportation most for farming it helped for bathing and food
The river valley civilizations used the rivers to travel as well as the Indus River valley. But the difference is that once was blocked to the world and one traded
Conflict avoidance is when one deliberately goes around or stays away from a conflict. Changing the subject that one wants to avoid is an example of this.
Conflict confrontation is when one deliberately handles a conflict directly. (Communication with and listening to the opposing party for an example.)
Conflict resolution is when a conflict or issue is resolved amicably by both parties involved.
Some things the Romans did for fun were horrible. They enjoyed fights between gladiators, and fights between people and animals. These bloodthirsty shows were put on in front of crowds in large arenas called amphitheatres. Roman emperors paid for free shows at theatres and amphitheatres.