The longest wavelength of radiation used to break carbon-carbon bonds is 344 nm.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The longest wavelength of radiation can also be stated as the minimum radiation frequency required to cut carbon-carbon bond should be equal to the threshold energy of the carbon-carbon bonds.
The threshold energy will be equal to the binding energy of the carbon-carbon bonds. As it is known that carbon-carbon bonds exhibit a binding energy of 348 kJ/mole, the threshold energy to break it, is determined as followed.
First, we have to convert the energy from kJ/mol to J, i.e., energy for the carbon-carbon molecules,
As,
So,
Thus, 
is the longest wavelength of radiation used to break carbon-carbon bonds.
Answer:
Explanation:
<u>Conservation of Momentum
</u>
The total momentum of a system of two particles is
Where m1,m2,v1, and v2 are the respective masses and velocities of the particles at a given time. Then, the two particles collide and change their velocities to v1' and v2'. The final momentum is now
The momentum is conserved if no external forces are acting on the system, thus
Let's put some numbers in the problem and say
120=120
It means that when the particles collide, the first mass returns at 6 m/s and the second continues in the same direction at 28 m/s
Answer:
Potential energy of book = 7.5 J
Explanation:
Given:
Weight of book = 5 N
Height of shelf = 1.5 meter
Find:
Potential energy of book
Computation:
Weight = Mass x Acceleration of gravity
Mass x Acceleration of gravity = 5 N
Potential energy = Mass x Acceleration of gravity x Height
Potential energy of book = Mass x Acceleration of gravity x Height
We know that;
Mass x Acceleration of gravity = 5 N
So,
Potential energy of book = 5 x 1.5
Potential energy of book = 7.5 J
<span>Psychological researchers must debrief human test subjects </span><span>at the end of every experiment.
The current code of ethics in p</span>sychological research states that researchers absolutely must debrief human test subjects at the end of every study regardless or whether or not harm or deception was involved.
Debriefing a subject after a study is an essential opportunity for the researcher to explain the purpose and aim of the study to the subject, make sure the subject is not harmed or mentally disturbed, clarify why deception was used (if deception was involved) and overall, to clarify any questions or doubts the subject might have.
