Answer:
About 38
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
-9, 9
Step-by-step explanation:
a² − 8ab + 16b² = 81
(a - 4b)² = 81 Wrote the left-hand side as a square
a - 4b = ±9 Took the square root of each side
All values of a - 4b are -9 and +9.
Answer:
When you're talking factors, you're talking about some sort of integer; that's because “factors” depends on the concept of divisibility, which are virtually exclusive to integers. When you're talking “greater than”, you're excluding complex numbers (where the concept of ordering doesn't exist) and you're probably assuming positive integers. If you are, then no; no positive integer has factors that are larger than it.
If you go beyond positive numbers, that changes. 0 is an integer, and has every integer, except itself, as factors; since its positive factors are greater than zero, there are factors of zero that are greater than zero. If you extend to include negative numbers, you always have both positive and negative factors; and since all positive integers are greater than all negative integers, all negative integers have factors that are greater than them.
Beyond zero, though, no integer has factors whose magnitudes are greater than its own. And that's a principle that can be extended even to the complex integers
Step-by-step explanation:
False because a number is rational if we can write it as a fraction where the top number of and bottom number are both whole numbers but irrational numbers is any number that is not rational. It is a number that cannot be written as a ratio of two integers(or cannot be expressed as a fraction)
D) EFGH moved onto E'F'G'H after rotating 180 counterclockwise around the origin and the reflecting across the y-axis.
<h3>How to carry out transformations?</h3>
From online resources gotten about this question, for quadrilateral EFGH and quadrilateral E'F'G'H to be congruent, what we must do first is to rotate 180° counterclockwise around the origin and then move EFGH onto E'F'G'H'.
The last step to get this proof of congruency is to reflect across the y-axis.
Read more about transformations at; brainly.com/question/4289712
#SPJ1
