Which phenomenon caused scientists to rethink their understanding of light as a wave?
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Note: I assume the mirror is concave, so that its focal length is positive (it is not specified in the text)
1a) We can use the mirror equation to find the distance of the image from the mirror:
where
is the focal length
is the distance of the object from the mirror
is the distance of the image from the mirror.
Rearranging the equation, we find
so, the distance of the image from the mirror is
.
1b) The image height is given by the magnification equation:
where
is the heigth of the image and 
is the height of the object. By rearranging the equation and using p and q, we find
and the negative sign means the image is inverted.
2) As before, we can find the distance of the image from the mirror by using the mirror equation:
Rearranging it, we find
so, the distance of the image from the mirror is
3) As before, we find the distance of the image from the mirror by using the mirror equation:
Rearranging it, we find
so, the distance of the image from the mirror is
And now we can use the magnification equation to find the image height:
Rearranging it, we find
and the negative sign means the image is inverted.
1a) We can use the mirror equation to find the distance of the image from the mirror:
where
Rearranging the equation, we find
so, the distance of the image from the mirror is
1b) The image height is given by the magnification equation:
where
and the negative sign means the image is inverted.
2) As before, we can find the distance of the image from the mirror by using the mirror equation:
Rearranging it, we find
so, the distance of the image from the mirror is
3) As before, we find the distance of the image from the mirror by using the mirror equation:
Rearranging it, we find
so, the distance of the image from the mirror is
And now we can use the magnification equation to find the image height:
Rearranging it, we find
and the negative sign means the image is inverted.
Your equation is:
An equation is balanced only if there are the same number of atoms of each element on both sides of the arrow - aka same number of atoms of each element in both reactants (left of the arrow) and products (right of the arrow).
It'll be easiest to tackle this by counting up the number of atoms of each element on the left and on the right and comparing those numbers. If there is a number in front of the entire compound, that means that number applies to all elements in the compound. If the number is a subscript (little number to the right of the element), that means that number only applies to the element that the subscript is attached to:
1) On the left, you have:
2) On the right, you have:
You can see that the number of oxygen and hydrogen atoms aren't equal on both the left (reactants) and the right (products), so the equation is unbalanced.
Your final answer is "T<span>he equation is unbalanced because the number of hydrogen atoms and oxygen is not equal in the reactants and in the products."</span>
An equation is balanced only if there are the same number of atoms of each element on both sides of the arrow - aka same number of atoms of each element in both reactants (left of the arrow) and products (right of the arrow).
It'll be easiest to tackle this by counting up the number of atoms of each element on the left and on the right and comparing those numbers. If there is a number in front of the entire compound, that means that number applies to all elements in the compound. If the number is a subscript (little number to the right of the element), that means that number only applies to the element that the subscript is attached to:
1) On the left, you have:
2) On the right, you have:
You can see that the number of oxygen and hydrogen atoms aren't equal on both the left (reactants) and the right (products), so the equation is unbalanced.
Your final answer is "T<span>he equation is unbalanced because the number of hydrogen atoms and oxygen is not equal in the reactants and in the products."</span>