One benefit of this is that the weaknesses of some of their plans are covered by better plans. Another is that if the final plan doesn’t result, there are already many other ideas to go off of. A final benefit is that if the overall plan does work, it can still be easily improvised. Hope this helps! After all, this question is more opinion based.
Low-cost energy. Although building nuclear power plants has a high initial cost, it's relatively cheap to produce energy from them and they have low operating costs.
Reliable.
Zero carbon emissions.
Promising future energy supply.
High energy density.
34.95 atm
lol i hope i’m not too late
Use the ICE table approach as solution:
PbSO₄ --> Pb²⁺ + SO₄²⁻
I - 0 0
C - +s +s
E - s s
Ksp = [Pb²⁺][SO₄²⁻]
1.82×10⁻⁸ = s²
Solving for s,
s = <em>1.35×10⁻⁴ M</em>
