Answer:
Yes, there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No ;
Step-by-step explanation:
n = 1000
x = 545
Phat = x / n = 545/1000 = 0.545
H0: p ≤ 0.5
H1: μ > 0.5
The test statistic :
(phat - p0) ÷ √(p(1 - P0) / n)
Test statistic :
(0.545 - 0.5) ÷ √(0.5(0.5) / 1000)
0.045 / 0.0158113
Test statistic = 2.846
α = 0.01
Decison :
Reject H0 ; if Pvalue < α
Using the Pvalue from Test statistic (Z) calculator :
Pvalue = 0.002214
With Pvalue < α ; We reject H0 and conclude that there is convincing evidence that the majority of women age 22 to 35 who work full-time would be willing to give up some personal time for more money.
No, making generalization about all women would not be reasonable as the data employed for the research mainly focuses on a particular
I believe it's one of the four in photo.
Answer:
There are 96 boys in the soccer league.
Step-by-step explanation:
You multiply 160 by 60%, which is also 160*.6.
160*.6=96
Answer:
The answer is "Option a, Option b, and Option d".
Step-by-step explanation:
In the given question it is used to stratifying the sampling if the population of this scenario it flights takes off when it is divided via some strata.
-
In option a, In this case, it stratified the sampling, as the population of planes taking off has been divided into the days of the week.
-
In option b, It also used as the case of stratified sampling.
-
In options c, it is systematic sampling, that's why it is wrong.
-
In option d, It is an example of stratifying the sampling.
