1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
disa [49]
2 years ago
13

The Articles of Confederation did not fully reflect the principle of "republicanism" because it stated one political party shoul

d maintain most of the power voters had no say in who represented them in federal government state governments were inferior to the national government representatives from each state government were elected by the people
History
1 answer:
SVEN [57.7K]2 years ago
3 0
It could be argued that the Articles of Confederation did not fully reflect the principle of "republicanism" because "<span>voters had no say in who represented them in federal government," since the states were supposed to have far more power over the federal government. </span>
You might be interested in
My question is in the picture, please answer it.
topjm [15]

Answer:   D

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
I need help with this one. Society as a whole was advanced by agriculture. Land that is farmed can support more than 50 times th
ELEN [110]
Im not completely sure but I think its B: great forests in North Africa were destroyed. My reason for this decision is that they probably destroyed the great forests for agriculturable land.

Hope this helps!
8 0
3 years ago
Why did the French people accept a dictator as their new leader after the Revolution?
Sav [38]
Why were the French people willing to accept a dictator/Emperor after overthrowing their king? The French people were willing to accept an Emperor after the overthrow of their king because they loved the fact that he did not lead by divine right but because he earned it and was basically a normal person.
3 0
3 years ago
Why are historians interested in studying past events?
podryga [215]
Bdjcjdbdjcjdjdkxkskkdnekaookw. jxjcjcjeje kdckkebdbtbt
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was a direct result of the Texas defeat at the Battle of the Alamo?
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer:

I believe the answer is B. Texas no longer had strong leaders.

Explanation:

Texas Revolution: October 1835 to April 1836 between Mexico and Texas colonists that resulted in Texas's independence from Mexico and the founding of the Republic of Texas.

In 1821, Mexico gained independence from Spain.

The revolution led to political paralysis and a death of effective governance in Texas.

Texas became independent and later became apart of the United States.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did most enslaved people in the Americas end up working on
    11·2 answers
  • How did the Louisiana purchase happen and who made it happen?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the term for appointed members who give the President advice and direct their departments
    7·1 answer
  • Why was Rhode Island different than other colonies?
    8·1 answer
  • What type of mathematics came to Europe from the Muslims?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the german invasion of poland in 1939
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements tells us the most correct information about the kind of military advantage the Europeans had o
    14·1 answer
  • How did the English colonists’ laws affect the Wampanoag tribe?
    6·1 answer
  • I NEED hElp I need answers
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a result of the French and Indian War?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!