Do you have options I can choose from?
Schenck v. United States, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 3, 1919, that freedom of speech could be restricted if the words spoken or printed ‘create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils which Congress has a right to prevent.’Answer:
Explanation:
Answer:
This activity is likely to contribute to students' literacy development primarily by imaginative method of the student. This is because, as the game progresses, the student would be left with no other option than to deploy his or her imagination in order to resolve the game.
<em>As the students plays the game, the other person meant to name the object being described would have know other option than to think of what the object could likely be thereby contributing to his or her literacy development.</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
One party of Franks, namely, Peter, the Hermit Duke Godfrey, Baldwin, his brother, ... Robert the Norman, Hugh the Great, Everard of Puiset, Achard of Montmerle, ... The wise man, Bohemund, also said that if the Count should do the Emperor any ... We did not dare to go outside; we could find absolutely nothing to eat within
Explanation:
Raymond of Toulouse, Robert of Normandy, Robert of Flanders, ... It makes much more sense to suppose, in so far as one can ... For Bohemond, who was to become Prince of Antioch, his social status was elevated substantially. ... The next day Hugh again went out to talk with Godfrey,
