Objectivity when studying sociology and society in general can have the following drawbacks:
1. Objectivity does not guarantee valid findings- When researching a social phenomenon, if a researcher is objective in his approach, operating on fixed-answer questions and predetermined research questions, he will likely miss out on in-depth and comprehensive answers or explanations to his questions.
2. Objectivity is not possible for all social phenomena since some phenomena or social processes are simply not quantifiable.
CFCs is the answer, hope this helped you.
Hey, guys it’s ____ and i wanted to tell you guys about my trip here. Let’s start with the Indus River Valley. The Indus River was a great place to go it had mountains and a dark blue river of life.
I also have to tell you guys about Ancient Egypt. Ancient Egypt was a great place very sandy but overall a great place to be people were very nice they had these little rock statues and it was gigantic I can’t wait to get home and explain everything.
LMK IF THAT HELPS YOU CAN CHANGE IT A BIT IF YOU NEED TO.
Hey there!
The answer to your question is African Americans.
There really isn't any scientific backing for this; it's just what the statistics show. People of African American descent are very much more likely to develop certain types of cancer. Biology and genetics are believed to be a part of this tragic problem, but there's no explanation to support any of it.
Hope this helps
I believe the answer is: government controls can guard against abuses of power
Federalist tend to want the government to have the largest control in society rather than the people or the states.
So the answers that federalist have to social issue tend to lean on creating more government control or giving the government more power to do intervention.
