It is not a chemical change because a chemical change is when the substance changes to a whole new substance (ex rust on a car) ex2(fire burning wood) it’s not the same substance) it is a physical change because it’s still water basically (ex: like melting ice, it’s still ice( not a whole different substance)
The reactions are a bit poorly written. While it's true that aqueous H₂CO₃ is produced in this neutralization reaction, the H₂CO₃ rapidly decomposes to yield CO₂(g) and H₂O(l). Writing the product as H₂CO₃(aq) in the net ionic equation is unnecessarily confusing since it portrays the substance as nonionizing yet water-soluble.
In any case, the Na⁺ and the Cl⁻ are the spectator ions here.
I believe it’s a because something cannot move unless a force is acted upon it
If there is an increase in industrial activity, that means that more heat will be dissipated to the atmosphere in the form of carbon dioxide. Industrialization requires fuel to keep the processes on the go. At the end of the pipeline, the combustion of fuel would result to carbon dioxide released to the atmosphere. That's how it is contributing to the global climate change through the greenhouse effect.