To solve, simply layout and equation.
3/6*2/6.
Step 1: Simply 3/6.
1/2*2/6
Step 2: Simplify 2/6.
1/2*1/3
Step 3: Multiply.
1/2*1/3
1/6.
So, the answer to this problem is 1/6.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Jill makes purses and backpacks.
Let x represent the number of foot of fabric required to make a purse.
Let y represent the number of foot of fabric required to make a backpack.
To make each purse,she uses 1 foot less than half the amount of fabric she uses to make a backpack. This means that
x = (y/2) - 1
Therefore, the amount of fabric that Jill needs to make backpack will be
y/2 = x-1
y = 2(x-1) = 2x - 2
The number of feet of fabric that she will use to make a purse is
x = (y/2) - 1
Answer:
On a coordinate plane, a line goes through (0, 3) and (2, 4) and another line goes through (0, 3) and (0.75, 0).
This answer almost coincide with option C. I suppose there was a mistype.
Step-by-step explanation:
The system of equations is formed by:
–x + 2y = 6
4x + y = 3
In the picture attached, the solution set is shown.
The first equation goes through (0, 3) and (2, 4), as can be checked by:
–(0) + 2(3) = 6
–(2) + 2(4) = 6
The second goes through (0, 3) and (0.75, 0), as can be checked by:
4(0) + (3) = 3
4(0.75) + (0) = 3
2x - 5x + 4 = 0
- 3x = - 4
x = 4/3
<em>I am against people doing this.</em>
<em>I think it's wrong because for some reason scientists are permitted to do this but that is breaking the law. I hate how they do it because these are just innocent animals that did nothing wrong to us, our scientists just decide it's ok to go stick needles in them and put stuff on them. My biggest problem with this is that they don't care about the effects their products have on innocent animals and instead of fixing their mistake and just apply it to humans, they just keep on going like there's no tomorrow. Animals have done nothing wrong to these people and I think that it's wrong to do so. Also, I don't really think that this proves anything. An animal's skin and fur are different than a human's skin and hair so it would make no sense to test these things on them because it really is guaranteed to give an accurate answer. Animals differ from us in so many ways that you should be able to think that scientists wouldn't harm these lovely creatures, but instead, they do. Why do scientists hurt these animals? I don't want to live in a world with hurt animals, especially when some of them have World Records, like the Sea Otter.</em>
<em>-R3TR0 Z3R0</em>