Nitrogen is a non-metal and aluminum is a metal so the bond would be ionic.
<span>I’ve answered this
question before so if these are the choices to the question presented:
An oxygen atom double-bonded to a carbon atom, with a hydrogen atom
single-bonded to the same carbon atom. </span><span>
<span>A hydrogen atom covalently bonded to an oxygen atom, which is
covalently bonded to a carbon in the carbon chain. </span>
<span>A carbon atom single-bonded between two other carbon atoms,
with an oxygen atom double-bonded to the central carbon atom as well. </span>
<span>An oxygen atom single-bonded between two carbon atoms within
a carbon chain.
Then, the answer would be “a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to an oxygen atom,
which is covalently bonded to a carbon in the carbon chain.<span>”</span></span></span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Hello there!
In this case, when considering weak acids which have an associated percent dissociation, we first need to set up the ionization reaction and the equilibrium expression:
![HA\rightleftharpoons H^++A^-\\\\Ka=\frac{[H^+][A^-]}{[HA]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=HA%5Crightleftharpoons%20H%5E%2B%2BA%5E-%5C%5C%5C%5CKa%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5BH%5E%2B%5D%5BA%5E-%5D%7D%7B%5BHA%5D%7D)
Now, by introducing x as the reaction extent which also represents the concentration of both H+ and A-, we have:
![Ka=\frac{x^2}{[HA]_0-x} =10^{-4.74}=1.82x10^{-5}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=Ka%3D%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E2%7D%7B%5BHA%5D_0-x%7D%20%3D10%5E%7B-4.74%7D%3D1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D)
Thus, it is possible to find x given the pH as shown below:
So that we can calculate the initial concentration of the acid:
![\frac{(1.82x10^{-5})^2}{[HA]_0-1.82x10^{-5}} =1.82x10^{-5}\\\\\frac{1.82x10^{-5}}{[HA]_0-1.82x10^{-5}} =1\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%281.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D%29%5E2%7D%7B%5BHA%5D_0-1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D%7D%20%3D1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cfrac%7B1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D%7D%7B%5BHA%5D_0-1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7D%7D%20%3D1%5C%5C%5C%5C)
![[HA]_0=3.64x10^{-5}M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5BHA%5D_0%3D3.64x10%5E%7B-5%7DM)
Therefore, the percent dissociation turns out to be:
![\% diss=\frac{x}{[HA]_0}*100\% \\\\\% diss=\frac{1.82x10^{-5}M}{3.64x10^{-5}M}*100\% \\\\\% diss = 50\%](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%25%20diss%3D%5Cfrac%7Bx%7D%7B%5BHA%5D_0%7D%2A100%5C%25%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%25%20diss%3D%5Cfrac%7B1.82x10%5E%7B-5%7DM%7D%7B3.64x10%5E%7B-5%7DM%7D%2A100%5C%25%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%25%20diss%20%3D%2050%5C%25)
Best regards!
You have to type in the answers as well so we have all the information.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
This is essentially one of the several safety measures in the chemical laboratory. This particular approach is one used in the case of fire eventualities.
A is wrong
This is because in the advent of a fire incident, it is necessary to evacuate the building as a whole. Meeting in the hallway is still within the building which is not the right thing to do when there’s a fire outbreak. Occupants are expected to leave the building immediately
B. Is also wrong. Taking time to pack your belongings might make you be caught in the inferno. It is expected that you leave the building at once
