1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Westkost [7]
3 years ago
12

Can anyone answer this ASAP I need it quick

Chemistry
1 answer:
Ne4ueva [31]3 years ago
8 0

See the attached image.

You might be interested in
Scientists saw how well people responded to animals and imagined ___________ that these interactions might be helpful in some ty
sukhopar [10]

For most of the last 50 years, technology knew its place. We all spent a lot of time with technology—we drove to work, flew on airplanes, used telephones and computers, and cooked with microwaves. But even five years ago, technology seemed external, a servant. These days, what’s so striking is not only technology’s ubiquity but also its intimacy.

On the Internet, people create imaginary identities in virtual worlds and spend hours playing out parallel lives. Children bond with artificial pets that ask for their care and affection. A new generation contemplates a life of wearable computing, finding it natural to think of their eyeglasses as screen monitors, their bodies as elements of cyborg selves. Filmmakers reflect our anxieties about these developments, present and imminent. In Wim Wenders’s Until the End of the World, human beings become addicted to a technology that shows video images of their dreams. In The Matrix, the Wachowski brothers paint a future in which people are plugged into a virtual reality game. In Steven Spielberg’s AI: Artificial Intelligence, a woman struggles with her feelings for David, a robot child who has been programmed to love her.

Today, we are not yet faced with humanoid robots that demand our affection or with parallel universes as developed as the Matrix. Yet we’re increasingly preoccupied with the virtual realities we now experience. People in chat rooms blur the boundaries between their on-line and off-line lives, and there is every indication that the future will include robots that seem to express feelings and moods. What will it mean to people when their primary daily companion is a robotic dog? Or to a hospital patient when her health care attendant is built in the form of a robot nurse? Both as consumers and as businesspeople, we need to take a closer look at the psychological effects of the technologies we’re using today and of the innovations just around the corner.

Indeed, the smartest people in the field of technology are already doing just that. MIT and Cal Tech, providers of much of the intellectual capital for today’s high-tech business, have been turning to research that examines what technology does to us as well as what it does for us. To probe these questions further, HBR senior editor Diane L. Coutu met with Sherry Turkle, the Abby Rockefeller Mauzé Professor in the Program in Science, Technology, and Society at MIT. Turkle is widely considered one of the most distinguished scholars in the area of how technology influences human identity.

Few people are as well qualified as Turkle to understand what happens when mind meets machine. Trained as a sociologist and psychologist, she has spent more than 20 years closely observing how people interact with and relate to computers and other high-tech products. The author of two groundbreaking books on people’s relationship to computers—The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit and Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet—Turkle is currently working on the third book, with the working title Intimate Machines, in what she calls her “computational trilogy.” At her home in Boston, she spoke with Coutu about the psychological dynamics between people and technology in an age when technology is increasingly redefining what it means to be human.

You’re at the frontier of research being done on computers and their effects on society. What has changed in the past few decades?

To be in computing in 1980, you had to be a computer scientist. But if you’re an architect now, you’re in computing. Physicians are in computing. Businesspeople are certainly in computing. In a way, we’re all in computing; that’s just inevitable. And this means that the power of the computer—with its gifts of simulation and visualization—to change our habits of thought extends across the culture.



5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
N writing a chemical equation that produces hydrogen gas, the correct representation of hydrogen gas is
andrezito [222]
Need more information
4 0
3 years ago
A sample of oxalic acid (a diprotic acid of the formula H2C2O4) is dissolved in enough water to make 1.00 L of solution. A 100.0
OleMash [197]

<u>Answer:</u> The mass of original oxalic acid sample is 6.75 grams

<u>Explanation:</u>

To calculate the concentration of acid, we use the equation given by neutralization reaction:

n_1M_1V_1=n_2M_2V_2

where,

n_1,M_1\text{ and }V_1 are the n-factor, molarity and volume of acid which is H_2C_2O_4

n_2,M_2\text{ and }V_2 are the n-factor, molarity and volume of base which is NaOH.

We are given:

n_1=2\\M_1=?M\\V_1=100.0mL\\n_2=1\\M_2=0.750M\\V_2=20.0mL

Putting values in above equation, we get:

2\times M_1\times 100.0=1\times 0.750\times 20.0\\\\M_1=\frac{1\times 0.750\times 20.0}{2\times 100.0}=0.075M

To calculate the mass of solute, we use the equation used to calculate the molarity of solution:

\text{Molarity of the solution}=\frac{\text{Mass of solute}}{\text{Molar mass of solute}\times \text{Volume of solution (in L)}}

Given mass of oxalic acid = ? g

Molar mass of oxalic acid = 90 g/mol

Molarity of solution = 0.075 M

Volume of solution = 1.00 L

Putting values in above equation, we get:

0.075M=\frac{\text{Mass of oxalic acid}}{90g/mol\times 1L}\\\\\text{Mass of oxalic acid}=(0.075\times 90\times 1)=6.75g

Hence, the mass of original oxalic acid sample is 6.75 grams

7 0
3 years ago
Water molecules tend to stick to one another by _____.
ser-zykov [4K]
Each water molecule consists of two atoms of the element hydrogen joined to one atom of the element oxygen. An interesting property of water is the ability of its molecules to “stick together.” This occurs because one side of each water molecule is slightly negative and the other side is slightly positive. The positive portion of a water molecule is attracted to the negative portion of an adjacent water molecule. As a result, water molecules are called polar molecules. They attract other water molecules like little magnets. It is most likely ionic bonding but between hydrogen and oxygen it is covalent.

<span />
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How many grams of NH3 can be produced from the reaction of 28g of N2 and 25g of H2?
Reika [66]
N2<span> + 3H</span>2<span> = 2NH</span><span>3
so, NH3 = (N2 + 3H2)/ 2
            =  (28g + 3*25g)/2
            = 51.5g</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Charge can be transfered during electrolysis. Name the type of particle responsible for the transfer of charge in the wire and i
    12·1 answer
  • Balance this equation:<br> 6K + 1Al2O3 ----&gt;<br> __K₂O+__Al
    10·1 answer
  • 12. Draw the lewis structure for the element to help you answer the question *
    11·1 answer
  • (25points) Explain in your own words the difference between atomic mass and atomic number. Where can you find this information o
    9·2 answers
  • DONT SKIPP What type of bond will occur between lithium and bromine?
    14·1 answer
  • Type the correct answer in each box.
    6·1 answer
  • The type of measurement that involves observing and describing the events of an experiment is called:
    11·1 answer
  • How many mL are in a cube that is 4 cm on every side?
    7·1 answer
  • Provide 3 examples of substances that are mixtures and list the substances in them
    13·2 answers
  • You have 700,000 atoms of a radioactive substance. After 2 half-lives have past, how
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!