Don’t understand this kind of math
7,000,000+80,000+200+80+7
Answer:
Based on the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion, there is convincing statistical evidence that he is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
The proportion from the sample of people from his party that support the law = 70%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 550 people
The proportion from the sample of people from the other party that support the law = 65%
The number the members of the politicians political party that support the law = 420 people
The confidence level of the test = 95%
The given confidence interval for the difference in proportion, C.I. = (-0.010, 0.110)
Given that the 95% confidence interval for the difference in population proportion ranges from -0.010, to 0.110, it is 95% certain that 0 is among the likely difference in proportion between the two populations and therefore, there is sufficient statistical evidence to suggest that there is no difference in the proportion of the members of either political that support the proposed new traffic law.
Answer:
16/45; 4/45; 1125
Step-by-step explanation:
Since you know that 4/9 and 1/5 are used, make them common denominators. So 4/9 would turn into 20/45 and 1/5 would be 9/45. It results in 29/45, but that is the amount spent, so you would subtract 45-29/45, resulting in 16/45. For B, you know that she spent 3/4 of the savings, so you know that 1/4 is not being spent. So use 1/4 multiplied by 16/45 from part A to get 4/45. For C, you know that 4/45 is $100, so I multiplied 45x100 to get 4500 and then divided by 4 to get 4500/4.
