Answer:
Both b. and c.
That is
b. i’m sorry, but the transfer disclosure statement covers all material facts that must be disclosed, and a person having aids is not a material fact, whether or not it would be applicable in this situation.
c. i’m sorry, but i am not permitted to answer this question, as it could be a potential civil rights violation, under the federal and state fair housing laws.
Explanation:
In the given instance the buyer if the property is asking if the previous tenant had AIDS and wants to use this information in the purchasing process. This is illegal and could result in legal action due to civil rights violation. Discrimination is not allowed in deciding to do business with another party, and the buyer is trying to discriminate on the grounds that the previous owner had AIDS.
Also in disclosing relevant information, wether the previous owner had AIDS is irrelevant to the sale of the house as it does not affect the quality of the house.
Andean Pact, I believe it the correct answer! Hope it helps!
The answer is this: employees would feel that their opinions matter if open communication is established between the manager and the employee by removing barriers to communication.
An example to this would be having brainstorming meetings where employees are free to give their ideas. Another option would be by eliminating the need to call the manager using suffixes such as Mr. or Dr.
By paraphrasing, an individual is:
ANSWER C. Putting another person's idea into different words or context
