Answer:
No, there is no evidence that the manufacturer has a problem with underfilled or overfilled bottles, due that according our results we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
Explanation:
according to this exercise we have the following:
σ^2 =< 0.01 (null hypothesis)
σ^2 > 0.01 (alternative hypothesis)
To solve we can use the chi-square statistical test. To reject or not the hypothesis, we have that the rejection region X^2 > 30.14
Thus:
X^2 = ((n-1) * s^2)/σ^2 = ((20-1)*0.0153)/0.01 = 29.1
Since 29.1 < 30.14, we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
The false positive from the response of hydrogen peroxide and the immunizing circle would be created by poor specificity. The recipe for specificity is TN/TN+FP. False-positive outcomes can be ascribed to meddling substances in nature where the strips are put away or utilized, for example, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or fade (hypochlorite).
C=2.41 g/L
m(NaCl)=0.291 g
c=m(NaCl)/v
v=m(NaCl)/c
v=0.291/2.41= 0.1207 L = 120.7 mL
Flame emission is a method of chemical that uses intensity of light from a flame.
Answer:
v2=40.35L
Explanation:
p1v1/t1=p2v2/t2
v2=t2p1v1/t1p2
v2=984*760*22.4/273.15*1520
v2=40.35 L
