Answer:
20 minutes
Step-by-step explanation:
x is 0 in the graph and y is 20
so 20 is your answer if 0 is x
Answer:
C. 430
Step-by-step explanation:
length: 11
weight: 5
height (double of weight): 10
2 * (5 * 11 + 10 * 11 + 10 * 5)= 430
What is the lower extreme and the upper extreme of the numbers 45, 51, 53, 55, 55, 65, 75, 81, 84, 87, 93, 93, 95, 96, 100
Greeley [361]
The lower extreme is the least value in the data set and the upper extreme is the greatest value. These two values can therefore be found directly from an ordered set of data.
Lower extreme is 45
Upper extreme is 100
Good luck
Yes it is possible for a geometric sequence to not outgrow an arithmetic one, but only if the common ratio r is restricted by this inequality: 0 < r < 1
Consider the arithmetic sequence an = 9 + 2(n-1). We start at 9 and increment (or increase) by 2 each time. This goes on forever to generate the successive terms.
In the geometric sequence an = 4*(0.5)^(n-1), we start at 4 and multiply each term by 0.5, so the next term would be 2, then after that would be 1, etc. This sequence steadily gets closer to 0 but never actually gets there. We can say that this is a strictly decreasing sequence.
If your teacher insists that the geometric sequence must be strictly increasing, then at some point the geometric sequence will overtake the arithmetic one. This is due to the nature that exponential growth functions grow faster compared to linear functions with positive slope.
