1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arlecino [84]
4 years ago
6

What is an example of a non contact force

Physics
1 answer:
olchik [2.2K]4 years ago
8 0

Answer: Gravitational force

Explanation:

A non contact force can be described as a force applied to an object by another body that is not in direct contact with it.

For example, an object thrown upwards will return back due to the force of gravity acting on it. So, it means Gravitational force is acting on the body without necessarily being in contact with that body.

You might be interested in
How is a pitch that is heard when waves are closely spaced together described?
Snezhnost [94]

Answer:

The correct answer is B. Hope this helps. Please tell me if I am right or wrong. Can I have brainliest if I am right?

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
The Big Bang is considered a scientific theory. Why is this true?
Kitty [74]

Answer:

Explanation:In the natural sciences we make observations and construct models.

If those models are consistent with our observations then we can make predictions from those models and test them against more observations.

If some observations contradict our models, then we can tell that our models are wrong or in need of modification.

For example, Newton's laws of physics provide pretty good models sufficient in accuracy to allow us to calculate how to land a man on the moon. Are they therefore true? Not exactly. Newton's laws fail to work well at velocities approaching the speed of light. So we can tell that they need some adjustment.

Einstein's special and general theory of relativity provide more accurate models. So are they true? They predict all sorts of strange behaviour which we have actually observed. They seem to provide useful models, but they do not explain everything. For example, the extreme conditions in a black hole or those we think existed at the start of the universe provide some challenges to General Relativity.

From a practical perspective it is useful to operate within theoretical frameworks that we treat as facts. We need to make assumptions in order to reach substantial conclusions. So we often act as if something like Big Bang theory is a fact, but we cannot know it to be so.

Essentially in any natural science we cannot prove anything to be true. We can demonstrate that theories are false. This is the honesty of science.

Consider an alternative theory: The universe and everything you "know" actually started  

10

minutes ago.

You may protest that you remember what you did yesterday. In my theory I can explain that these are simply implanted memories, not real. What about radiometric dating? What about the Andromedra galaxy being  

2.5

million light years away, so the light we see from it started travelling in our direction  

2.5

million years ago? In my theory I can claim that these are all an elaborate implanted fiction.

There is no way to prove that this theory is true and probably no way to prove that it is false.

5 0
4 years ago
Which of the following is an adaptation that helps protect the animal?
satela [25.4K]
The color or pattern of shape/size
4 0
3 years ago
Your local AM radio station broadcasts at a frequency of f = 1100 kHz. The electric-field component of the signal you receive at
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

(a) 272.73 m

(b) 0.338 N/C

Explanation:

frequency, f = 1100 kHz = 1100 x 1000 Hz

E(t) = Eo Sin(2πft)

Eo = 0.62 N/C

(a) Velocity of light, c = 3 x 10^8 m/s

wavelength, λ = c / f = (3 x 10^8) / (1100000) = 272.73 m

Thus, the wavelength is 272.73 m.

(b) at t = 3.1 microsecond = 3.1 x 10^-6 s

E = Eo Sin (2 π ft)

E = 0.62 Sin (2 x 3.14 x 1100 x 10^3 x 3.1 x 10^-6)

E = 0.62 Sin (21.4148)

E = 0.62 x 0.5449 = 0.338 N/C

Thus, the electric field at t = 3.1 microsecond s 0.338 N/C.

6 0
3 years ago
A moving object always has energy in its?
Flura [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

Kinetic and potential energies are found in all objects. If an object is moving, it is said to have kinetic energy (KE). Potential energy (PE) is energy that is "stored" because of the position and/or arrangement of the object.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • As you know, the oceans are a complex system that covers most of the earth, and contains a huge amount of resources. Protecting
    9·2 answers
  • A 42.0-cm diameter disk rotates with a constant angular acceleration of 2.70 rad/s2. It starts from rest at t = 0, and a line dr
    15·1 answer
  • How does the light source readout differ from the x-ray readout in the gizmo?
    12·1 answer
  • In the chemical reaction in which carbon, hydrogen and oxygen absorb heat and combine to form carbon dioxide and water which of
    13·2 answers
  • In a flying ski jump, the skier acquires a speed of 110 km/h by racing down a steep hill and then lifts off into the air from a
    12·1 answer
  • what is the final speed of a skater who accelerates at a rate of 2.0m/s^2 from rest for 3.5s? Show your work
    5·2 answers
  • A uniform thin rod is hung vertically from one end and set into small amplitude oscillation. If the rod has a length of 2.6 m, t
    5·1 answer
  • What is work done in physics?
    12·2 answers
  • What are the reasons for the establishment of UGA?
    6·1 answer
  • Trong thí nghiệm về giao thoa sóng trên mặt nước gồm hai nguồn kết hợp S1S2 cách nhau 15 cm với dao động với tần số 30Hz. Tốc độ
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!