A theorem can be proven (from axioms or prior theorems), using logic.
A hypothesis can be supported by evidence. The more evidence in support of the hypothesis, the more likely the hypothesis is to be correct. However, you’re always at the mercy of contrary evidence appearing in the future, to reduce the likelihood or even invalidate a hypothesis.
A (mathematical) proof suffers no such vulnerability to future evidence, as long as you hold the axioms of the theory to be true, and as long as there was no flaw in the construction of the proof.
Answer: for 1 is number 1
and for 2 is 3
Explanation:
Answer:
a) 
b) 
Explanation:
a)
Given:
amount of heat transfer occurred,
initial temperature of car, 
final temperature of car, 
We know that the change in entropy is given by:
(heat is transferred into the system of car)
b)
amount of heat transfer form the system of house, 
initial temperature of house, 
final temperature of house, 
Answer:
The function that describe the motion in the time
y (t) = 0.28m * sin ( 36.025 * t)
Explanation:
The angular frequency of oscillation of the spring
w = √k/m
w = √305 N/m / 0.235 kg
w = 36.025 rad / s
To determine the function of the motion knowing as a motion oscillation in a amplitude a frequency
y(t) = A * sin (w t )
So
A = 28.0 cm * 1 m / 100 cm = 0.28 m
So replacing to determine the function of the motion in the time
y (t) = A sin (w t)
y (t) = 0.28m * sin ( 36.025 * t)
Answer: holding the ball in the air without moving it
Explanation:
When the ball goes up it’s potential energy
