Answer:
The mouse runs faster to have the same kinetic energy as the elephant.
Explanation:
Note from the equation given, mass (m) is directly proportional to KE. This means an elephant with more mass will have more KE, therefore, for the mouse to compensate, it has to run faster because its KE is smaller because of its small mass. If both run at the same speed, the elephant would have thousands of times more kinetic energy than the mouse. So the mouse has to run faster so that its speed compansates for its smaller weight.
Answer:
16 m/s^2
Explanation:
acceleration tangential = (v^2)/r
a=400/25
a=16 m/s^2
Side note: next time, be more specific when asking about acceleration in circular motion. There's more than one type! Example:
angular acceleration=acceleration tangential/r
angular acc.=16/25
angular acc.=0.64 rad/s^2
Answer:
25.59 m/s²
Explanation:
Using the formula for the force of static friction:
--- (1)
where;
static friction force
coefficient of static friction
N = normal force
Also, recall that:
F = mass × acceleration
Similarly, N = mg
here, due to min. acceleration of the car;
From equation (1)
However, there is a need to balance the frictional force by using the force due to the car's acceleration between the quarter and the wall of the rocket.
Thus,
where;
and g = 9.8 m/s²
The kinetic energy of the small ball before the collision is
KE = (1/2) (mass) (speed)²
= (1/2) (2 kg) (1.5 m/s)
= (1 kg) (2.25 m²/s²)
= 2.25 joules.
Now is a good time to review the Law of Conservation of Energy:
Energy is never created or destroyed.
If it seems that some energy disappeared,
it actually had to go somewhere.
And if it seems like some energy magically appeared,
it actually had to come from somewhere.
The small ball has 2.25 joules of kinetic energy before the collision.
If the small ball doesn't have a jet engine on it or a hamster inside,
and does not stop briefly to eat spinach, then there won't be any
more kinetic energy than that after the collision. The large ball
and the small ball will just have to share the same 2.25 joules.
I’m not sure if its correct but I think it’s focal Ray point
For concave mirrors, some generalizations can be made to simplify ray construction. They are: An incident ray traveling parallel to the principal axis will reflect and pass through the focal point. An incident ray traveling through the focal point will reflect and travel parallel to the principal axis.
