1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Butoxors [25]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following is the accurate APA format for writing out the bragger condition main effect result for the willingness o

f participants to participate in the hour long study?
a-We ran a univariate ANOVA with a bragger condition (Truthful vs Untruthful) and participant ethnicity (Caucasian vs African American) as our two independent variables and Edward likeability as the dependent variable. There was no significant main effect for bragger condition, F(1, 116) = 68.65, p < .001. Participants thought Edward was similarly likeable in the Truthful Bragger condition (M = 6.83, SD = 1.14) and the Untruthful Bragger condition (M = 5.80, SD = 0.82).
b-We ran a univariate ANOVA with bragger condition (Truthful vs Untruthful) and participant ethnicity (Caucasian vs African American) as our two independent variables and Edward likeability as the dependent variable. There was a significant main effect for bragger condition, F(1, 120) = 68.65, p < .001. Participants thought Edward was more likeable in the Truthful Bragger condition (M = 6.83, SD = 1.14) than in the Untruthful Bragger condition (M = 5.80, SD= 0.82).
c-We ran a univariate ANOVA with bragger condition (Truthful vs Untruthful) and participant ethnicity (Caucasian vs African American) as our two independent variables and Edward likeability as the dependent variable. There was a significant main effect for bragger condition, F(1, 116) = 68.65, p < .001. Participants thought Edward was more likeable in the Truthful Bragger condition (M = 5.80, SD = 0.82) than in the Untruthful Bragger condition. (M = 6.83, SD= 1.14)
d-We ran a univariate ANOVA with bragger condition (Truthful vs Untruthful) and participant ethnicity (Caucasian vs African American) as our two independent variables and Edward likeability as the dependent variable. There was a significant main effect for bragger condition, F(1, 116) = 68.65, p < .001. Participants thought Edward was more likeable in the Truthful Bragger condition (M = 6.83, SD = 1.14) than in the Untruthful Bragger condition (M = 5.80, SD= 0.82).
e-We ran a univariate ANOVA with bragger condition (Truthful vs Untruthful) and participant ethnicity (Caucasian vs African American) as our two independent variables and Edward likeability as the dependent variable. There was a significant main effect for bragger condition, F(1, 116) = 31.86, p < .001. Participants thought Edward was more likeable in the Truthful Bragger condition (M = 6.83, SD = 1.14) than in the Untruthful Bragger condition (M = 5.80, SD= 0.82).
Mathematics
1 answer:
Rama09 [41]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

First, the main effect for bragger condition is significant because F statistic is F(1,116) = 68.65 with p value = 0.000, which is less than 0.001

mean and standard deviation for truthful Bragger condition are 6.83 and 1.14

mean and standard deviation for untruthful Bragger condition are 5.80 and 0.82

So, it is clear that the Edward was more likeable in the Truthful Bragger condition.

Therefore, option D is answer

You might be interested in
When evaluating, what will be the exponent of 10 in the quotient?<br> 3<br> 4<br> 8<br> 16
qaws [65]
In this case it would be 8
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Let n1equals50​, Upper X 1equals30​, n2equals50​, and Upper X 2equals10. Complete parts​ (a) and​ (b) below. a. At the 0.05 leve
Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

Null hypothesis:p_{1} = p_{2}  

Alternative hypothesis:p_{1} \neq p_{2}  

z=\frac{0.6-0.2}{\sqrt{0.4(1-0.4)(\frac{1}{50}+\frac{1}{50})}}=4.082    

p_v =2*P(Z>4.082)=4.46x10^{-5}  

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example \alpha=0.05 always p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion 1 is significantly different from proportion 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation  

X_{1}=30 represent the number of people with a characteristic in 1

X_{2}=10 represent the number of people with a characteristic in 2

n_{1}=50 sample of 1 selected  

n_{2}=50 sample of 2 selected  

p_{1}=\frac{30}{50}=0.6 represent the proportion of people with a characteristic in 1

p_{2}=\frac{10}{50}=0.2 represent the proportion of people with a characteristic in 2

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

p_v represent the value for the test (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the proportion 1 is different from proportion 2 , the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:p_{1} = p_{2}  

Alternative hypothesis:p_{1} \neq p_{2}  

We need to apply a z test to compare proportions, and the statistic is given by:  

z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}   (1)  

Where \hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{30+10}{50+50}=0.4  

3) Calculate the statistic  

Replacing in formula (1) the values obtained we got this:  

z=\frac{0.6-0.2}{\sqrt{0.4(1-0.4)(\frac{1}{50}+\frac{1}{50})}}=4.082    

4) Statistical decision

For this case we don't have a significance level provided \alpha, but we can calculate the p value for this test.    

Since is a two sided test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z>4.082)=4.46x10^{-5}  

So the p value is a very low value and using any significance level for example \alpha=0.05 always p_v so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say the the proportion 1 is significantly different from proportion 2.  

3 0
3 years ago
What triangle does it form ?
diamong [38]

Answer:

Scalene triangle

Step-by-step explanation:

A scalene triangle is a triangle with three different side lengths and angle measures. Since none of the side lengths are the same length, then none of the angle measures are the same either leading the correct answer to be scalene.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The perimeter of the triangular park shown on the right is 14x-5. What is the missing​ length?
Lina20 [59]

Answer:70

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement describes the congruent triangles
4vir4ik [10]

Answer:

2 triangles

Step-by-step explanation:

2 triangles are said to be congruent when all the corresponding sides of the angle and the interior angles are congruent . The two triangle are said to be the mirror image of each other.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What the slope is, and if it's a fraction it needs to be simplified.
    12·2 answers
  • The length of a rectangle is 8 1/2 inches and the width is 3 1/4 inches. What is the ratio, using whole numbers, of the length t
    14·1 answer
  • Demand the demand function for a product is modeled by
    13·1 answer
  • How many cups does it take to reach the empire state building which is 1454 ft and one cup is 3.7 ft?? show all the work
    8·1 answer
  • If f(x)=3x^2+1 and g(x)=1-x, what is the vaue of (f-g)(2)?<br> [•12 •14 •36 •38]
    15·1 answer
  • Calculate the volume of each rectangular prism using the information that is provided.
    10·1 answer
  • Which number is farther from 0 on a number line -9 or 6
    5·2 answers
  • An article is marked to sell at a gain of 10%. If it be sold for Rs. 7.50 less there would be loss of 5%, find the cost price. ​
    14·1 answer
  • A car’s wheels spin at 1000 revolutions per minute. The diameter of the wheels is 23 inches. You want to know how fast the car i
    11·1 answer
  • Compare the quantity in Column A with the<br> quantity in Column B.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!