1). both
2). Venus
3). Venus catastrophically; Earth too but much less.
4). Earth
5). Earth
6). Venus (It would be pretty hard for US to mistake Earth for a star.)
The correct answer is
<span>A. decreasing the current
In fact, the magnetic field produced by a current carrying wire is given by
</span>

<span>where
</span>

is the vacuum permeability
<span>I is the current in the wire
r is the distance from the wire at which the field is calculated
We see from the formula that the intensity of the field, B, is directly proportional to the current I, so if the current decreases, the magnetic field strength B decreases as well.</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
Since both vectors are pointing on the same direction (Northeast), the sum of them will point in that same direction, and its magnitud will be the sum of the magnitudes of each vector (40m/s2+10m/s2). This problem is just a problem in one dimension. The sum of the vectors is then 50m/s2 Northeast.
Answer:
Explanation:
A chemical change.
Usually those are irreversible. Or they may be reversible, but the form they take may leave your object not the same as they started out.
A physical change might be just as deadly. If the object melted like a chocolate Easter Bunny then the object would be irreversible as well. Take a better example.
Suppose you are talking about a Gold Coin. If you heated it so it melted, the gold would retain its value, but the fact that it is a coin and valuable as such, means that it has lost that part of its value.
I really don't know. My instincts tell me that the chemical change is more dangerous, but I can't rule out the other choice..