1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnoma [55]
3 years ago
12

A worker is told her chances of being killed by a particular process are 1 in every 300 years. Should the worker be satisfied or

alarmed? What is the FAR (assuming normal working hours) and the deaths per person per year? What should her chances be, assuming an average chemical plant?
Chemistry
1 answer:
Pavlova-9 [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

(a) Yes, he should be worried. The Fatal accident rate (FAR) is too high according to standars of the industry. This chemical plant has a FAR of 167, where in average chemical plants the FAR is about 4.

(b) FAR=167 and Death poer person per year = 0.0033 deaths/year.

(c) The expected number of fatalities on a average chemical plant are one in 12500 years.

Explanation:

Asumming 50 weeks of work, with 40 hours/week, we have 2000 work hours a year.

In 300 years we have 600,000 hours.

With these estimations, we have (1/600,000)=1.67*10^(-6) deaths/hour.

If we have 2000 work hours a year, it is expected 0.0033 deaths/year.

1.67*10^{-6} \frac{deaths}{hour}*2000 \frac{hours}{year}=0.0033 deaths/year

The Fatal accident rate (FAR) can be expressed as the expected number of fatalities in 100 millions hours (10^(8) hours).

In these case we have calculated 1.67*10^(-6) deaths/hour, so we can estimate FAR as:

FAR=1.67*10^{-6} \frac{deaths}{hour}*10^{8}  hours=1.67*10^{2} =167

A FAR of 167 is very high compared to the typical chemical plants (FAR=4), so the worker has reasons to be worried.

If we assume FAR=4, as in an average chemical plant, we expect

4\frac{deaths}{10^{8} hour} *2000\frac{hours}{year}=8*10^{-5} \frac{deaths}{year}

This is equivalent to say

\frac{1}{8*10^{-5} } \frac{years}{death}=1.25*10^{4} \frac{years}{death} =12500 \, \frac{years}{death}

The expected number of fatalities on a average chemical plant are one in 12500 years.

You might be interested in
What is the answer? show proof I will report you if you answer for the points​
IceJOKER [234]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

carbon dioxide is released in cellular respiration

3 0
3 years ago
What is the maximum mass of b4c that can be formed from 2.00 moles of boron(iii) oxide?
anzhelika [568]

The maximum mass of B₄C that can be formed from 2.00 moles of boron (III) oxide is 55.25 grams.

<h3>What is the stoichiometry?</h3>

Stoichiometry of the reaction gives idea about the relative amount of moles of reactants and products present in the given chemical reaction.

Given chemical reaction is:

2B₂O₃ + 7C → B₄C + 6CO

From the stoichiometry of the reaction, it is clear that:

2 moles of B₂O₃ = produces 1 mole of B₄C

Now mass of B₄C will be calculated by using the below equation:

W = (n)(M), where

  • n = moles = 1 mole
  • M = molar mass = 55.25 g/mole

W = (1)(55.25) = 55.25 g

Hence required mass of B₄C is 55.25 grams.

To know more about stoichiometry, visit the below link:

brainly.com/question/25829169

#SPJ1

3 0
3 years ago
Calculate the Ka for the following acid. Determine if it is a strong or weak acid.
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

a) Ka= 7.1 × 10⁻⁴; This is a weak acid because the acid is not completely dissociated in solution.

Explanation:

Step 1: Write the dissociation reaction for nitrous acid

HNO₂(aq) ⇄ H⁺(aq) and NO₂⁻(aq)

Step 2: Calculate the acid dissociation constant

Ka = [H⁺] × [NO₂⁻] / [HNO₂]

Ka = 0.022 × 0.022 / 0.68

Ka = 7.1 × 10⁻⁴

Step 3: Determine the strength of the acid

Since Ka is very small, nitrous acid is a weak acid, not completely dissociated in solution.

4 0
3 years ago
How many moles of copper are needed to react with sulfur to produce 0.25 moles of copper sulfide
Setler [38]
                                        Cu + S ---> CuS
by reaction                      1 mol           1 mol
from the problem         0.25 mol        0.25 mol
 0.25 mol   Cu
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do you solve this ??
kotegsom [21]
Answer : Option A) 2.00 eV

Explanation : The conversion of J to eV is done with the following formula;

E_{eV} = E_{J} X (6.241 X 10^{18})

Here, we have the value of particle in terms of Joules which is 3.2 X 10^{-19}

So, on substituting we get,
E_{eV} = 3.2 X 10^{-19}  X  (6.241 X 10^{18} )


E_{eV} = 1.99 eV so, it can be rounded off to 2.00 eV.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The force of gravity pulls all objects downwards." which of these statements is correct about the law of science?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the percentage by mass of nacl in a saturated solution of sodium chloride at 50c
    5·1 answer
  • I’m microsoft word you can access what from the mini toolbar
    15·1 answer
  • Block mountains form along which type of geological landform?
    10·2 answers
  • The compound CaSO4 ionizes into a calcium ion and a sulfate ion (SO4). Calcium has two electrons in its outer shell. Upon ioniza
    11·1 answer
  • Which one of these statements would be considered a hypothesis? *
    15·2 answers
  • Where on the periodic table are the transition metals located​
    8·2 answers
  • Hey what's the value of pi till<br>5 digits after decimal​
    14·2 answers
  • What do the two arrows in the diagram most likely represent?
    5·1 answer
  • If the car still produces 8500N, but now it accelerates at only 4 m/s2 what is the MASS
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!