All categories

3 years ago

Is all parallelograms a square,why?

Mathematics

2 answers:

pychu [463]3 years ago

6 0

No, all parallelograms are not squares because squares have to have all 90 degree angles, while parallelograms don't

NARA [144]3 years ago

6 0

No it’s not a parallogram

You might be interested in

Use the Divergence Theorem to evaluate S F · dS, where F(x, y, z) = z2xi + y3 3 + sin z j + (x2z + y2)k and S is the top half of

GenaCL600 [577]

Close off the hemisphere $S$ by attaching to it the disk $D$ of radius 3 centered at the origin in the plane $z=0$ . By the divergence theorem, we have

$\displaystyle\iint_{S\cup D}\vec F(x,y,z)\cdot\mathrm d\vec S=\iiint_R\mathrm{div}\vec F(x,y,z)\,\mathrm dV$

where $R$ is the interior of the joined surfaces $S\cup D$ .

Compute the divergence of $\vec F$ :

$\mathrm{div}\vec F(x,y,z)=\dfrac{\partial(xz^2)}{\partial x}+\dfrac{\partial\left(\frac{y^3}3+\sin z\right)}{\partial y}+\dfrac{\partial(x^2z+y^2)}{\partial k}=z^2+y^2+x^2$

Compute the integral of the divergence over $R$ . Easily done by converting to cylindrical or spherical coordinates. I'll do the latter:

$\begin{cases}x(\rho,\theta,\varphi)=\rho\cos\theta\sin\varphi\\y(\rho,\theta,\varphi)=\rho\sin\theta\sin\varphi\\z(\rho,\theta,\varphi)=\rho\cos\varphi\end{cases}\implies\begin{cases}x^2+y^2+z^2=\rho^2\\\mathrm dV=\rho^2\sin\varphi\,\mathrm d\rho\,\mathrm d\theta\,\mathrm d\varphi\end{cases}$

So the volume integral is

$\displaystyle\iiint_Rx^2+y^2+z^2\,\mathrm dV=\int_0^{\pi/2}\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^3\rho^4\sin\varphi\,\mathrm d\rho\,\mathrm d\theta\,\mathrm d\varphi=\frac{486\pi}5$

From this we need to subtract the contribution of

$\displaystyle\iint_D\vec F(x,y,z)\cdot\mathrm d\vec S$

that is, the integral of $\vec F$ over the disk, oriented downward. Since $z=0$ in $D$ , we have

$\vec F(x,y,0)=\dfrac{y^3}3\,\vec\jmath+y^2\,\vec k$

Parameterize $D$ by

$\vec r(u,v)=u\cos v\,\vec\imath+u\sin v\,\vec\jmath$

where $0\le u\le 3$ and $0\le v\le2\pi$ . Take the normal vector to be

$\dfrac{\partial\vec r}{\partial v}\times\dfrac{\partial\vec r}{\partial u}=-u\,\vec k$

Then taking the dot product of $\vec F$ with the normal vector gives

$\vec F(x(u,v),y(u,v),0)\cdot(-u\,\vec k)=-y(u,v)^2u=-u^3\sin^2v$

So the contribution of integrating $\vec F$ over $D$ is

$\displaystyle\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^3-u^3\sin^2v\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv=-\frac{81\pi}4$

and the value of the integral we want is

(integral of divergence of F) - (integral over D) = integral over S

==> 486π/5 - (-81π/4) = 2349π/20

5 0

3 years ago

The weight of people in a small town in missouri is known to be normally distributed with a mean of 154 pounds and a standard de

ad-work [718]

If a random sample of 20 persons weighed 3,460, the sample mean x-bar would be 3460/20 = 173 pounds.
The z-score for 173 pounds is given by:
$z=\frac{173-154}{29}=0.655$
Referring to a standard normal distribution table, and using z = 0.66, we find:
$P(\bar x\ \textless \ 173)=0.7454$
Therefore
$P(\bar x\ \textgreater \ 173)=1-0.7454=0.2546$
The answer is: 0.2546

4 0

3 years ago

If F(x)=2x^2+3, then which of the following represent f(x+1). A.2x^2+2. B. X^2+3. C. 2x^2+4x+1. D. 2x^2+4x+5

serg [7]