Answer:
a) not proportional
b) proportional; k = 
Step-by-step explanation:
a) for any proportional equation, the line must pass through the origin. The equation in a) is y = 4x + 1, and the '+1' is the y-intercept. This means that the line does not pass through the origin, so x and y cannot increase by the same amount (i.e. they are not proportional).
Another way to determine this is is to use the y = kx base. If you have an equation that fits that it's likely proportional.
Here, if the equation was only y = 4x then it'd be proportional because u can see that k = 4. This is not the equation though, and the 4x + 1 doesn't fit to the y = kx formula so it can't be proportional.
b) straight away you can see that there's no 'c' term (y = mx + c) which means the y-intercept is 0, so the line passes through the origin. While this does not immediately mean the line is proportional, you can make sure that it is by checking it fits with the y = kx equation.
y = -(3/5)x fits with y = kx, with k being -3/5
Answer:
check: 50+160+130+20 = 360
50:160 = 5 : 16
Step-by-step explanation:et the smaller of the unknown angles be 5x and the larger of the two be 16x
so 130+20+5x+16x = 360
21x = 210
x = 10
so the two missing angles are 50° and 160°
check: 50+160+130+20 = 360
50:160 = 5 : 16
Not 100% sure this is right but
60cm^2
Answer:
Yes, he would take the same decision.
Step-by-step explanation:
Consequently, because the decision is taken on the test based on the use of alpha equals 0.025, the p-value of the test must have been greater than the given amount of importance that is 0.025 since the test is not applicable to us. So, p > 0.025.
If we know that p > 0.025, that would not mean p > 0.1 as well, because we do not know with the details given he had to make the same decision for 0.1 degree of meaning.
As for the 0.01 significance point, we 're sure p > 0.01 is greater than 0.025, so the test does not matter.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
7+4y=7-5y+54
Collecting like terms
4y + 5y = 7 - 7 + 54
9y = 54
y = 54/9
y = 6