Answer:
According to these figures, Oak has <em><u> more </u></em>equivalent units of production for materials and <u><em> fewer </em></u> equivalent units of production for conversion costs than Maple
Explanation:
Oak EU:
Transferred units less percentage of completion beginning inventory plus completion on ending inventory
<u><em>Materials:</em></u>
208,900
58,000 x 40% (they were added the 40% at beginning but, not the remaining 60%)
59,400 x 100% (they reach the 70% threshold so the rest of the materials where added)
Equivalent units Materials 245100
<u><em>Conversion:</em></u>
208,900 - 58,000 x 65% + 59,400 x 70%
212780
Maple EU:
<u><em>Materials:</em></u>
210,500 - 61,200 x 40% + 52,400 x 100% =
238420
<u><em>Conversion:</em></u>
210,500 - 61,200 x 60% + 52,400 x 90% =
220940
Oak v Maple:
Materials:
Oak Maple
245100 > 238420
Conversion:
Oak Maple
212780 < 220940