All categories

3 years ago

What is the timeline for the law of conservation of energy

1 answer:

4 0

In 1842, Julius Robert Mayer discovered The law of conservation of Energy. It its most compact form, it it now called The first law of Thermodynamics

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it can only be changed to another form of energy.

You might be interested in

In the simplified version of Kepler's third law, P 2 = a3, the units of the orbital period P and the semimajor axis a of the ell

Orlov [11]

Answer:

The units of the orbital period P is years and the units of the semimajor axis a is astronomical units.

Explanation:

P² = a³ is the simplified version of Kepler's third law which governs the orbital motion of large bodies that orbit around a star. The orbit of each planet is an ellipse with the star at the focal point.

Therefore, if you square the year of each planet and divide it by the distance that it is from the star, you will get the same number for all the other planets.

Thus, the units of the orbital period P is years and the units of the semimajor axis a is astronomical units.

8 0

3 years ago

A 77.0−kg short-track ice skater is racing at a speed of 12.6 m/s when he falls down and slides across the ice into a padded wal

sukhopar [10]

Answer:

-6112.26 J

Explanation:

The initial kinetic energy, $KE_i$ is given by

$KE_i=0.5mv_1^{2$ } where m is the mass of a body and $v_i$ is the initial velocity

The final kinetic energy, $KE_f$ is given by

$KE_f=0.5mv_f^{2}$ where $v_f$ is the final velocity

Change in kinetic energy, $\triangle KE$ is given by

$\triangle KE=KE_f-KE_i=0.5mv_f^{2}-0.5mv_1^{2}=0.5m(v_f^{2}-v_i^{2})$

Since the skater finally comes to rest, the final velocity is zero. Substituting 0 for $v_f$ and 12.6 m/s for $v_i$ and 77 Kg for m we obtain

$\triangle KE=0.5*77*0^{2}-0.5*77*(0^{2}-12.6^{2})=-6112.26 J$

From work energy theorem, work done by a force is equal to the change in kinetic energy hence for this case work done equals -6112.26 J

3 0

3 years ago

Establishing a potential difference The deflection plates in an oscilloscope are 10 cm by 2 cm with a gap distance of 1 mm. A 10

11111nata11111 [884]

Answer:

$1.62\times 10^{-8}\ \text{s}$

Explanation:

$\epsilon_0$ = Vacuum permittivity = $8.854\times 10^{-12}\ \text{F/m}$

$A$ = Area = $10\times 2\times 10^{-4}\ \text{m}^2$

$d$ = Distance between plates = 1 mm

$V_c$ = Changed voltage = 60 V

$V$ = Initial voltage = 100 V

$R$ = Resistance = $1000\ \Omega$

Capacitance is given by

$C=\dfrac{\epsilon_0A}{d}\\\Rightarrow C=\dfrac{8.854\times 10^{-12}\times 10\times 2\times 10^{-4}}{1\times 10^{-3}}\\\Rightarrow C=1.7708\times 10^{-11}\ \text{F}$

We have the relation

$V_c=V(1-e^{-\dfrac{t}{CR}})\\\Rightarrow e^{-\dfrac{t}{CR}}=1-\dfrac{V_c}{V}\\\Rightarrow -\dfrac{t}{CR}=\ln (1-\dfrac{V_c}{V})\\\Rightarrow t=-CR\ln (1-\dfrac{V_c}{V})\\\Rightarrow t=-1.7708\times 10^{-11}\times 1000\ln(1-\dfrac{60}{100})\\\Rightarrow t=1.62\times 10^{-8}\ \text{s}$

The time taken for the potential difference to reach the required level is $1.62\times 10^{-8}\ \text{s}$ .

5 0

3 years ago

The slope of a good speed Time indicates ?

11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

The answer would be acceleration.

8 0

3 years ago

Explain how the situation shown above would be different if the skier experiences friction while traveling downhill. Include the

aleksandrvk [35]

Answer:

The force of friction acts in the direction opposite to the direction of motion. If friction would have been applied to the skier it would have resulted in a lower velocity and less kinetic energy.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago