1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
luda_lava [24]
3 years ago
14

Chlorine has two naturally stable isotopes: 35Cl (34.968853 amu) and 37Cl (36.965903 amu). The natural abundance of each isotope

varies in different regions of the universe. In the Gribble region of space, the molar mass for a sample of chlorine is 36.36575 g/mol. Using only these three values, determine the relative percent abundance of 35Cl.
Chemistry
1 answer:
allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

35Cl ⇒ 34.968853 amu  has an abundance of 30.05%

Explanation:

The molar mass of chlorine, (which is the average of all its naturally stable isotope masses), is 36.36575 amu.

There are 2 naturally stable isotopes, this means together they have an abundance of 100%

The isotopes are:

35Cl ⇒ 34.968853 amu  has an abundance of X %

37Cl ⇒ 36.965903 amu  has an abundance of Y %

X + Y = 100%   OR X = 100% - Y

36.36575 = 34.968853X + 36.965903Y  

36.36575 = 34.968853(1-Y) + 36.936.96590365903Y

36.36575 = 34.968853 -34.968853Y + 36.965903Y

1.396897 = 1.99705Y

Y = 0.699 = 69.95%

X = 100-69.9 = 30.05%

To control, we can plug in the following equation:

34.968853 * 0.3005 + 36.965903 * 0.6995 = 36.3658

This means

37Cl ⇒ 36.965903 amu  has an abundance of 69.95 %

35Cl ⇒ 34.968853 amu  has an abundance of 30.05%

You might be interested in
In a redox reaction, electrons are transferred from the substance being reduced to the oxidizing agent.
babymother [125]

<u>Answer:</u> The correct answer is from the substance being oxidized to the substance being reduced.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Redox reaction is defined as the reaction in which oxidation and reduction reaction occur simultaneously.

Oxidation reaction is defined as the reaction where an atom looses its electrons. The oxidation number of the atom gets increased during this reaction.

X\rightarrow X^{n+}+ne^-

Reducing agents are defined as the agents which reduces the other substance and itself gets oxidized. These agents undergoes reduction reactions.

Reduction reaction is defined as the chemical reaction where an atom gains electrons. The oxidation number of the atom gets reduced during this reaction.

X^{n+}+ne^-\rightarrow X

Oxidizing agents are defined as the agents which oxidize other substance and itself gets reduced. These agents undergoes reduction reactions.

Electrons are transferred from one atom to another in this type of reaction from the substance which is getting oxidized to the substance which is getting reduced.

It can also be said that, electrons are transferred from reducing agent to the oxidizing agent.

Hence, the correct answer is from the substance being oxidized to the substance being reduced.

4 0
3 years ago
A celestial body is any natural (i.
Nastasia [14]

THE ANSWER IS I.ASTEROIDS   II.COMETS   III. METEOROIDS   IV. PLANETS PLZ MARK BRAINLISEST HOPE I HELPED THX

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement about Fe is supported by the modern atomic theory but not John Dalton’s theory?
lana66690 [7]

Answer:

The correct option is B

Explanation:

One of the claims of John Dalton's atomic theory is that atom is the smallest unit of matter (which suggests that there are no particles smaller than an atom in any matter). This claim has been disproved by the modern atomic theory which established that there are particles smaller than atom (called subatomic particles). These particles are electrons, protons and neutrons.

One of the modern atomic theory was by Neils Bohr, who proposed that <u>electrons move in circular orbits around the central nucleus</u>. Thus, the electrons of iron can also be said to be present in a region of space (circular path) around the nucleus. This proves that option B is the correct option as John Dalton's theory did not even recognize the electron(s) nor the nucleus.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When you connect your evidence to your claim you are using your
trapecia [35]

Answer:

2. reasoning

Explanation:

PLS GIVE BRAINLIEST

3 0
3 years ago
Can you force the atoms into new configurations by pushing atoms around
marta [7]
<span>No, this is not possible. The reason for this impossibility is that the electrons are not attracted to one another, and thus, would repel. If you were to push the atoms into each other, the electrons would then prevent this from happening. Essentially atoms will bounce off of one another due to the repel of charges.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A neutral atom has a mass number of 108 and in atomic number of 47 which atom is this? explain how you know.
    7·1 answer
  • Determine the average rate of decomposition of h3po4 between 10.0 and 40.0 s. express your answer with the appropriate units.
    6·1 answer
  • The tungsten metal used for filaments in light bulbs is made by reaction of tungsten trioxide with hydrogen: WO3(s)+3H2(g)→W(s)+
    12·1 answer
  • Which is a polar molecule?
    8·1 answer
  • Which equation shows the beta decay of a transuranium element
    9·1 answer
  • Gasoline is a mixture of hydrocarbons, a major component of which is octane, CH3CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH2CH3. Octane has a vapor pressu
    7·1 answer
  • Does anyone know this??
    7·1 answer
  • Fill in the blank.<br><br>If you gone call me a _____ make sure you put _______ infront of it
    11·1 answer
  • Nitrate has the formula \textit {NO}_\textit3^-NO
    14·1 answer
  • Which group of measurements is the most precise? (Each group of measurements is for a different object.)
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!