No. I do not agree with Stefan. Quite the contrary. I disagree
with his description of "<span>angle of incidence" as the angle between
the surface of the mirror and the incoming ray.
The correct description of "angle of incidence" is </span><span>the angle between
the NORMAL TO the surface of the mirror and the incoming ray.
Thus, the true angle of incidence is the complement of the angle that
Stefan calculates or measures.</span>
When driver see the child standing on road his speed is 20 m/s
So here at that instant his reaction time is 0.80 s
He will cover a total distance given by product of speed and time



now after this he will apply brakes with acceleration a = 7 m/s^2
so the distance covered before it stop is given by



so the total distance covered by it


<em>so it will cover a total distance of 44.6 m</em>
Complete Question
A flat loop of wire consisting of a single turn of cross-sectional area 8.00 cm2 is perpendicular to a magnetic field that increases uniformly in magnitude from 0.500 T to 1.60 T in 0.99 s. What is the resulting induced current if the loop has a resistance of 
Answer:
The current is
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The area is
The initial magnetic field at
is 
The magnetic field at
is 
The resistance is 
Generally the induced emf is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally the current induced is mathematically represented as

=>
=>
answer is the color white
After x seconds, an object will fall

where a is acceleration due to gravity and t is time
so when t=3.3
the distance it will fall is

=53.361m
it will fal 53.361 meters