1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna71 [15]
3 years ago
11

In Millikan's oil drop experiment an oil drop is at rest between two large plates separated by 1.3 cm when the potential differe

nce between the plates is 400 V. If the charge carried by the oil drop is that of six electrons, what is the mass of the oil drop?
Physics
1 answer:
sweet-ann [11.9K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Mass of the oil drop, m=3.01\times 10^{-15}\ kg

Explanation:

Potential difference between the plates, V = 400 V

Separation between plates, d = 1.3 cm = 0.013 m

If the charge carried by the oil drop is that of six electrons, we need to find the mass of the oil drop. It can be calculated by equation electric force and the gravitational force as :

qE=mg

m=\dfrac{qE}{g}

q=6e, e is the charge on electron

E is the electric field, E=\dfrac{V}{d}=\dfrac{400}{0.013}=30769.23\ V/m

m=\dfrac{6\times 1.6\times 10^{-19}\times 30769.23}{9.8}

m=3.01\times 10^{-15}\ kg

So, the mass of the oil drop is 3.01\times 10^{-15}\ kg. Hence, this is the required solution.

You might be interested in
Which features on mars point to the possibility of liquid water on the planet?
Stells [14]
     In 2011 NASA researchers identified features on Mars known as Recuring Slope Lineae ( or RSL ). RSL are relatively dark and narrow features.They are thought to be a signs of salty liquid water on Mars. One hypothesis for RSL formation is that they form when underground bodies of salty water leak into the surface.
   Answer: Recuring Slope Lineae. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the magnitude of the total acceleration of point A after 2 seconds? The bar starts from rest and has a constant angular
monitta

Answer:

a_total = 2 √ (α² + w⁴) ,   a_total = 2,236 m

Explanation:

The total acceleration of a body, if we use the Pythagorean theorem is

          a_total² = a_T²2 + a_{c}²

where

the centripetal acceleration is

  a_{c} = v² / r = w r²

tangential acceleration

   a_T = dv / dt

angular and linear acceleration are related

         a_T = α  r

we substitute in the first equation

       a_total = √ [(α r)² + (w r² )²]

       a_total = 2 √ (α² + w⁴)

Let's find the angular velocity for t = 2 s if we start from rest wo = 0

        w = w₀ + α t

        w = 0 + 1.0 2

        w = 2.0rad / s

       

we substitute

        a_total = r √(1² + 2²) = r √5

        a_total = r 2,236

In order to finish the calculation we need the radius to point A, suppose that this point is at a distance of r = 1 m

         a_total = 2,236 m

7 0
3 years ago
A fish tank is a cube of size L × L × L, where L = 1 m, filled with water. Find
Murljashka [212]

At the bottom of the tank :

P = ρgH

P = (1000 kg/m³)(10 m/s²)(1 m)

P = 10000 N/m²

F = P • A

F = (10000 N/m²)(1 m²)

F = 10000 N

At the side of the tank :

Pav = ½ρgH

Pav = ½(1000 kg/m³)(10 m/s²)(1 m)

Pav = 5000 N/m²

F = P • A

F = (5000 N/m²)(1 m²)

F = 5000 N

3 0
2 years ago
Within the theory of G relativity what, exactly, is meant by " the speed of light WITHIN A VACUUM" ? & what does that have t
Ber [7]
The speed of light "within a vacuum" refers to the speed of electromagnetic radiation propagating in empty space, in the complete absence of matter.  This is an important distinction because light travels slower in material media and the theory of relativity is concerned with the speed only in vacuum.  In fact, the theory of relativity and the "speed of light" actually have nothing to do with light at all.  The theory deals primarily with the relation between space and time and weaves them into an overarching structure called spacetime.  So where does the "speed of light" fit into this?  It turns out that in order to talk about space and time as different components of the same thing (spacetime) they must have the same units.  That is, to get space (meters) and time (seconds) into similar units, there has to be a conversion factor.  This turns out to be a velocity.  Note that multiplying time by a velocity gives a unit conversion of
seconds \times  \frac{meters}{seconds} =meters
This is why we can talk about lightyears.  It's not a unit of time, but distance light travels in a year.  We are now free to define distance as a unit of time because we have a way to convert them.  
As it turns out light is not special in that it gets to travel faster than anything else.  Firstly, other things travel that fast too (gravity and information to name two).  But NO events or information can travel faster than this.  Not because they are not allowed to beat light to the finish line---remember my claim that light has nothing to do with it.  It's because this speed (called "c") converts space and time.  A speed greater than c isn't unobtainable---it simply does not exist.  Period.  Just like I can't travel 10 meters without actually moving 10 meters, I cannot travel 10 meters without also "traveling" at least about 33 nanoseconds (about the time it takes light to get 10 meters)  There is simply no way to get there in less time, anymore than there is a way to walk 10 meters by only walking 5.  
We don't see this in our daily life because it is not obvious that space and time are intertwined this way.  This is a result of our lives spent at such slow speeds relative to the things around us.
This is the fundamental part to the Special Theory of Relativity (what you called the "FIRST" part of the theory)  Here is where Einstein laid out the idea of spacetime and the idea that events (information) itself propagates at a fixed speed that, unlike light, does not slow down in any medium.  The idea that what is happening "now" for you is not the same thing as what is "now" for distant observers or observers that are moving relative to you.  It's also where he proposed of a conversion factor between space and time, which turned out to be the speed of light in vacuum.
3 0
4 years ago
16. Compared to your weight and mass on Earth, if you were on the moon: *
Natalija [7]

Answer:

The answer is D.

Explanation:

There is no gravity in Space so that means that it will decrease your weight but not your mass.

<h2><u><em>Please give Brainiest</em></u></h2>
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • An ideal measuring device is one that does not alter the very measurement it is meant to take. Therefore, in comparison with the
    14·1 answer
  • A person lifts a 4.5 kg cement block a vertical distance of 1.2 m and then carries the block horizontal- ly a distance of 7.3 m.
    15·1 answer
  • A bumper has a non negligible mass. After a collision with an ideal spring, the spring is compressed to a distance of 90% of the
    8·1 answer
  • A cannon is mounted on a cart which sits on the ground, supported by frictionless wheels. The mass of the cannon and cart is 4.6
    13·2 answers
  • Which best describes a major characteristic of both volcanoes and earthquakes? they are centered at the poles?
    6·1 answer
  • . A weather balloon is inflated to a volume of 2.2 x 103 L with 37.4 g of helium. What is the density of helium in grams per lit
    14·1 answer
  • You walk to the north, then turn 90° to your left and walk another How far are you from where you originally started?
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP I NEED TO TURN IT IN IN AN HOUR ITLL GIVE YOU POINTS PLS PLEASE
    15·1 answer
  • Who were we in the space/arms race with?<br> In the movie *Hidden figures*
    7·1 answer
  • Density of solids What is your hypothesis (or hypotheses) for this experiment?.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!