<span>Tony did not breach a contract because it was all up to Lorene and who she wanted to go with. Lorene is not obligated to go with either. Although Bill spent most of his allowance, he could still ask someone else, sell his ticket and or even go by himself. I do not think Tony could be held liable even if he knew. It was not a nice thing to flake on Bill, but ultimately, it was Lorene's decision to make.</span>
Answer:
c. No; the facts of this situation do not provide reasonable grounds for a stop and search. Any attempt to do so by store security could result in a claim of false imprisonment.
Explanation:
According to the situation described in the question above, store security has no right to stop and search for Jeff. Therefore, the letter c is the most correct answer to this question.
Jeff's actions in the store do not provide sufficient reasons for there to be any kind of stop and research, as the facts in the situation do not provide enough information about an illegal act, so if store security forces a situation there could be legal damage to the store .
Therefore, it is essential that stores adopt a theft prevention strategy, with an effective security system and a team prepared to carry out correct approaches.
Answer:
Explanation:
D = 60 bags
cost = 80 / bag
s = 20 / order
h = 40% of cost
0.4 * 80 / 100
h= 32 unit/year
D = d * 12 months
D = 60 * 12
D = 720 bags / year
EOQ = 
EOQ = 
EOQ = 30 bags
Total cost = Total holding cost + total ordering cost
Total holding cost = (Q/2 * H) = (30/2 * 32) = 480
Total ordering cost = (D/Q * 20) = (720/30 *20) = 480
Total cost = 480 + 480 = 960
Total purchasing cost = cost * D = 80 * 720 = 57.600
Percentage= total cost / total purchasing cost * 100
960 / 57.600 * 100
1.67 %
