1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Liula [17]
3 years ago
13

Which process is a physical change? iron rusting milk turning into curd water boiling paper burning hard water stains pipes?

Chemistry
2 answers:
Elodia [21]3 years ago
6 0
Iron rusting over is a physical change.
Len [333]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: Option (c) is the correct answer.

Explanation:

A change that causes no change in chemical composition of a substance is known as a physical change.

For example, boiling of water is a physical change as state of water is changing from liquid to vapors.

On the other hand, a change that causes a change in chemical composition of a substance is known as a chemical change.

For example, rusting of iron, churning of milk into curd, burning of paper, stains of hard water on pipes are all chemical changes.

Thus, we can conclude that water boiling process is a physical change.

You might be interested in
The following data was collected for the formation of ammonia (NH3) based on the following overall reaction: N2 + 3H2 = 2NH3 N2
notsponge [240]

Answer :  The unit for the rate constant in the rate law for the formation of ammonia is, M^{-2}min^{-1}

Explanation :

Rate law is defined as the expression which expresses the rate of the reaction in terms of molar concentration of the reactants with each term raised to the power their stoichiometric coefficient of that reactant in the balanced chemical equation.

For the given chemical equation:

N_2+3H_2\rightarrow 2NH_3

Rate law expression for the reaction:

\text{Rate}=k[N_2]^a[H_2]^b

where,

a = order with respect to N_2

b = order with respect to H_2

Expression for rate law for first observation:

0.0021=k(0.10)^a(0.10)^b ....(1)

Expression for rate law for second observation:

0.0084=k(0.10)^a(0.20)^b ....(2)

Expression for rate law for third observation:

0.0672=k(0.20)^a(0.40)^b ....(3)

Dividing 2 by 1, we get:

\frac{0.0084}{0.0021}=\frac{k(0.10)^a(0.20)^b}{k(0.10)^a(0.10)^b}\\\\4=2^b\\b=2

Dividing 3 by 1 and also put value of b, we get:

\frac{0.0672}{0.0021}=\frac{k(0.20)^a(0.40)^2}{k(0.10)^a(0.10)^2}\\\\2=2^a\\a=1

Thus, the rate law becomes:

\text{Rate}=k[N_2]^a[H_2]^b

\text{Rate}=k[N_2]^1[H_2]^2

Now, calculating the value of 'k' by using any expression.

0.0021=k(0.10)^1(0.10)^2

k=2.1M^{-2}min^{-1}

The value of the rate constant 'k' for this reaction is 2.1M^{-2}min^{-1}

That means, the unit for the rate constant in the rate law for the formation of ammonia is, M^{-2}min^{-1}

7 0
4 years ago
What is the theoretical yield of vanadium, in moles, that can be produced by the reaction of 1.0 mole of V2O5 with 4.0 moles of
IRINA_888 [86]

Answer:

Theoretical yield of vanadium = 1.6 moles

Explanation:

Moles of V_2O_5 = 1.0 moles

Moles of Ca = 4.0 moles

According to the given reaction:-

V_2O_5_{(s)} + 5Ca_{(l)}\rightarrow 2V_{(l)} + 5CaO_{(s)}

1 mole of V_2O_5 react with 5 moles of Ca

Moles of Ca available = 4.0 moles

Limiting reagent is the one which is present in small amount. Thus, Ca is limiting reagent. (4.0 < 5)

The formation of the product is governed by the limiting reagent. So,

5 moles of Ca on reaction forms 2 moles of V

1 mole of Ca on reaction for 2/5 mole of V

4.0 mole of Ca on reaction for \frac{2}{5}\times 4 mole of V

Moles of V = 1.6 moles

<u>Theoretical yield of vanadium = 1.6 moles</u>

4 0
3 years ago
What do we need to know about a molecule in order to carry out molarity calculations
professor190 [17]

Answer the type of cell

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
suppose you need to build a raft to cross a fast-moving river. describe the physical and chemical properties of the raft that wo
amid [387]
You need a density less than water enough strength not to bend or break
8 0
3 years ago
What is a possible quantum number set for an electron in the 3s orbital of a magnesium atom
Alik [6]
  • <em>n</em> = 3
  • <em>l</em> = 0
  • m_l = 0
  • m_s = 1/2 or -1/2
<h3>Explanation</h3>

There are four quantum numbers in an electron that orbits the atom.

  • <em>n</em>, the principal quantum number.
  • <em>l</em>, the angular quantum number.
  • m_l, the magnetic quantum number.
  • m_s, the spin quantum number.

<em>n</em> is a positive integer. The value of n indicates the main shell of the electron. The electron in question is in the 3s orbital. As a result, <em>n</em> = 3.

<em>l</em> is a non-negative integer. The value of <em>l</em> indicates the type of subshell ("orbital") of the electron. The types of subshells possible depends on the main shell. For example, both s and p orbitals exist in the second main shell. However, only the s orbital exists in the first main shell. The value of <em>l</em> ranges from 0 to <em>n</em> - 1.

  • <em>l</em> = 0 indicates an <em>s</em> orbital.
  • <em>l</em> = 1 indicates a <em>p</em> orbital.
  • <em>l</em> = 2 indicates a <em>d</em> orbital.
  • <em>l</em> = 3 indicates an <em>f</em> orbital.

The electron in question is in an <em>s</em> orbital. As a result, <em>l </em>= 0.

m_l is an integer. The value of m_l indicates the position of the electron within the subshell. The range of m_l depends on the value of <em>l</em>. m_l ranges from -<em>l</em> to <em>l </em>(that's <em>-l</em>, ..., -1, 0, 1, ... <em>l</em>). Accordingly, there are 2 <em>l</em>  + 1 orbitals in a <em>l</em> subshell. <em>l </em>= 0 for this 3s<em> </em>electron. There's only one orbital in the 3s subshell. The only m_l value possible for this electron is 0.

The value of m_s is either - 1/2 or 1/2. It indicates the position of an electron within a single orbital. The value of m_s does not depend on that of <em>n</em>, <em>l</em>, or m_l. However, by the Pauli Exclusion Principle, at least one of the four numbers must differ for two electrons in the same atom. In case all three of <em>n</em>, <em>l</em>, and m_l are the same, the two electrons must differ in m_s. However, this question asks only for the number of one single electron. Thus, giving either - 1/2 or 1/2 shall work.

<h3>Reference</h3>

Vitz et. al, "5.8 Quantum Numbers (Electronic)",  <em>ChemPRIME (Moore et al.)</em>, Chemistry Libretexts. 27 Oct 2017.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • If m = 100 kg and a = 4 m/s2, than what is the force (f)? ______ N
    12·2 answers
  • In a cathode ray tube, the number of electrons that reach the fluorescent screen is controlled by the
    13·1 answer
  • Which organism is able to form organized patterns of behavior through the process of integration because it has ganglia?
    12·2 answers
  • Which conclusion was drawn from the results ofthe gold foil experiment?(1) an atom is electrically neutral.(2) an atom is mostly
    9·1 answer
  • What is a hypothesis?
    13·2 answers
  • Water wheels convert the kinetic energy of moving water into which form? A. potential energy B. chemical energy C. gravitational
    6·1 answer
  • How much of 500 grams of carbon-14 remains after 28,575 years?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the charge of the following polyatomic ions
    10·1 answer
  • Enid claims that two concentrated solutions will have a lower reaction rate
    11·2 answers
  • Which is not a property of metal * 1 point conductivity
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!