Mostly because the lake smell really bad and the waters really dirty
Use the formula E=mc^2
energy given=<span>8.1 x 10^16 joules
</span>speed of <span>light = 3.00 × 10^8 m/s
</span>
plug in the values we'll get mass=<span>9.0 x 10-1 kg</span>
Answer: 10.9 mol.
Explanation:
- To understand how to solve this problem, we must mention the reaction equation where water produced from PbO₂.
Pb + PbO₂ + 2H₂SO₄ → 2PbSO₄ + 2H₂O
- Now, it is a stichiometric oriented problem, that 1 mole of PbO₂ produces 2 moles of H₂O.
Using cross multiplication:
1.0 mole of PbO₂ → 2.0 moles of H₂O
5.43 moles of PbO₂ → ??? moles of water
The moles of water produced = (5.43 x 2.0) = 10.86 moles ≅ 10.9 moles.
Answer:
Depends on molecule.
Explanation:
The number of the polypeptide chains present in the oligomer depends on the molecule. Some molecules have more polypeptide chains whereas some of them have less polypeptide chains. For example, Hemoglobin is a oligomer that consists of four Polypeptide Chains, two of these Polypeptide Chains are α-globin molecules, each comprise of 141 amino acids, and the other two are (β, γ, δ, or ε) globins, each consist of 146 amino acids.
Answer:
C and D
Explanation:
Claims based on science are claims that can be backed up by data and evidence. In the sentence "Data from ice cores show that global temperatures are rising dramatically.", the part "Data from" inclines that there is factually proof backing up the claim. Part of the sentence "Satellite imagery shows.." inclines that there is also proof/evidence backing this claim. The other two sentences are <em>opinions</em> based on science. Instead, they should give some sort of data/evidence that would support that claim.
