I am guessing this is true or false?
And the answer is true.
A significant portion of psychological experts suggest that
they are not very good at predicting future violence. This notwithstanding, law courts usually uphold
psychological experts’ legitimacy on offering testimony on an individual’s
future dangerousness, especially while determining whether a death sentence is
appropriate or not.
Answer:
The right response is "forethought".
Explanation:
- The forethought method comprises methodologies where certain students are involved before teaching methods, including achievement motivation and sometimes a program evaluation.
- Important explanatory religious views were indeed self-efficacy, expectations of outcomes, inner involvement, or even just objective orientation.
