Answer:
D. Kailey is not correct: 
is not written in scientific notation.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have been given that Kailey wrote 8,912,000 in scientific notation as . We are asked to choose the statement that best describes Kailey's work.
We know that to convert a number into scientific notation, we write the given number as product of two numbers. One factor is a number between 1 and 10, while the 2nd factor is power of 10.
Upon looking at , we can see that 1st factor is 89.10, which is greater than 10. This means that Kailey did not write 8,912,000 in scientific notation.
Therefore, option D is correct choice.
i. 171
ii. 162
iii. 297
Solution,
n(U)= 630
n(I)= 333
n(T)= 168
i. Let n(I intersection T ) be X
<h3>ii.
n(only I)= n(I) - n(I intersection T)</h3><h3>
= 333 - 171</h3><h3>
= 162</h3>
<h3>
iii. n ( only T)= n( T) - n( I intersection T)</h3><h3>
= 468 - 171</h3><h3>
= 297</h3>
<h3>
Venn- diagram is shown in the attached picture.</h3>
Hope this helps...
Good luck on your assignment...
I hope its clear that answer to the first part
Answer:
just tell her that you want to see your friends again or say that you think it will have a better effect on your grades. you could say that it would be eaiser to pay attention in class and that CV cases are droping so it would be still be safe to go.
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps!
