Answer:
"A translation of 7 units to the left followed by a translation of 1 unit down".
Step-by-step explanation:
There are multiple transformations that map one point into another, here is one example that works particularly for translations, which are the simplest (and usually the most used) transformations.
Suppose that we have the point (a, b) which is transformed into (a', b')
Then we have a horizontal translation of (a' - a) units followed by a vertical translation of (b' - b) units.
(the order of the translations does not matter, is the same having first the vertical translation and then the horizontal one).
Here we have the point A (3, 4) transformed into (-4, 3)
Then we have a horizontal translation of ((-4) - 3) = -7 units followed by a vertical translation of (3 - 4) = -1 units.
Where a horizontal translation of -7 units is a translation of 7 units to the left, and a vertical translation of -1 unit is a translation of 1 unit down.
Then we can write this transformation as:
"A translation of 7 units to the left followed by a translation of 1 unit down".
Answer:
No, I do not agree with the conjecture because 1 is not a prime number.
Step-by-step explanation:
A prime number is one that can be divided by 1 and itself only. Thus it can be expressed in 2 factors only, 1 and the number itself.
Examples are; 2, 3, 5, 13, 19 , 23 etc.
So, 2 = 1 x 2
3 = 1 x 3
23 = 1 x 23
Prime numbers must be expressed as the product of 1 and the number.
The conjecture that every prime number can be expressed as the product of two prime numbers is false. Because 1 is not a prime number, since it has no 2 factors.
Answer:
7 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
try putting (1.6 x 7.5)+48 in a calculator i just put random numbers in the x spot until i got 60 lol
Answer:
sorry
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1600 square feet
Step-by-step explanation:
