Answer:
The correct answer is option (a) The court probably found that the state law was unconstitutional under the supremacy cause.
Explanation:
Solution
From the given questions it states that, What would be the court's most likely response to Ralph's lawsuit.
The court's decision response would be that, I that when the situation arises or occurs in that case, where there is a conflict which arises between federal and state law then in that case federal law must be applied.
Answer:
The correct answer is: oligopoly.
Explanation:
A market structure where there are only a few firms is called an oligopoly market. These firms can be producing either identical products or differentiated products.
Because of few firms, there is a high degree of competition in the market. The firms are price makers and face a downward sloping curve.
There is interdependence in the market such that the economic decisions of a firm affects the price, profits and output level of its rivals. So the firms have to consider the reaction of its rivals before making an economic decision.
Answer:
B. FUTA will be the correct answer which means Federal Unemployment Tax Act.
Explanation:
If your google the meaning of FUTA it will bring up the meaning
Answer: stability
Explanation: In simple words ,The probability that the origin of the attribution would change over a duration of time is called attribution. For instance, if a person decides to get such a big promotion, they might equate it to a lack of skill.
This suggests uncertainty, as the person must improve their skills and obtain an education in order to ultimately influence the outcome. It is not a sustainable situation, but one that can be modified by behavioral change.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is D.
Answer:
Answer is explained in the explanation section.
Explanation:
If the wages of the Hispanics construction worker in America are less then, they will not have near as much money to send home to their relatives back in Mexico.
And if their families do not have as much as it use to be then they will not be able to buy near as much as they used to.
It means that if the construction workers don't get as much money as they used to then, neither they nor their families will be able to spend as much as they use to which will obviously hurt each of their economies.