The given question is incomplete. The complete question is as follows.
Which of the following best helps explain why an increase in temperature increases the rate of a chemical reaction?
(a) at higher temperatures, high-energy collisions happen less frequently.
(b) at low temperatures, low-energy collisions happen more frequently.
(c) at higher temperatures, less-energy collisions happen less frequently.
(d) at higher temperatures, high-energy collisions happen more frequently
Explanation:
When we increase the temperature of a chemical reaction then molecules of the reactant species tend to gain kinetic energy. As a result, they come into motion which leads to more number of collisions within the molecules.
Therefore, chemical reaction will take less amount of time in order to reach its end point. This means that there will occur an increase in rate of reaction.
Thus, we can conclude that the statement at higher temperatures, high-energy collisions happen more frequently, best explains why an increase in temperature increases the rate of a chemical reaction.
Answer:
Charles Darwin
Explanation:
Charles Darwin is more famous than his contemporary Alfred Russel Wallace who also developed the theory of evolution by natural selection. scientist who studies living organisms.J
The paper clips will magnetically connect to the nail. With the copper wire wrapped around then nail, it makes a magnetic field that, when powered will cause metal objects to come toward it, hence why it is called an "electromagnet".
Hope this helps!!!
Newton's third law states that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The action and reaction forces are pairs of opposing forces.
In the given examples all three obey Newton's third law.
B) Action force: John pulls the door handle
Reaction: door handle gets pulled
C) Action force: Tire pushes on road
Reaction: The road pushes on the tire, vehicle moves
D) Action force: Exhaust pushes out of a rocket
Reaction: Rocket is pushed forward
Ans A) All these are examples of Newtons third law
True because its still technically the same substance