<span>After many experiments and many different approaches to the question, the scientist may be able to develop a theory. The theory explains why nature behaves in the way described by the natural law. It answers not only the original question, but also any other questions that were raised during the process. The theory also predicts the results of further experiments, which is how it is checked. Theories are not the end of the process.</span>
Yes it could, but you'd have to set up the process very carefully.
I see two major challenges right away:
1). Displacement of water would not be a wise method, since rock salt
is soluble (dissolves) in water. So as soon as you start lowering it into
your graduated cylinder full of water, its volume would immediately start
to decrease. If you lowered it slowly enough, you might even measure
a volume close to zero, and when you pulled the string back out of the
water, there might be nothing left on the end of it.
So you would have to choose some other fluid besides water ... one in
which rock salt doesn't dissolve. I don't know right now what that could
be. You'd have to shop around and find one.
2). Whatever fluid you did choose, it would also have to be less dense
than rock salt. If it's more dense, then the rock salt just floats in it, and
never goes all the way under. If that happens, then you have a tough
time measuring the total volume of the lump.
So the displacement method could perhaps be used, in principle, but
it would not be easy.
<span>The difference in the energy exerted by an 8.0 earthquake compared to a 6.0 earthquake
A magnitude 8.0 earthquake is 100 times bigger and 1000 times stronger (energy released) than a magnitude 6.0 earthquake.
</span>
Answer : The change in entropy is 
Explanation :
Formula used :
where,
= change in entropy = ?
m = mass of water = 1.00 kg
= heat of vaporization of water = 
T = temperature = 
Now put all the given values in the above formula, we get:
Therefore, the change in entropy is
