1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ahat [919]
3 years ago
8

I WILL NO JOKE MARK BRAINIEST IF SOMEONE ACTUALLY ANSWERS THIS!

Mathematics
1 answer:
UkoKoshka [18]3 years ago
6 0

You can see that the area of the blue rug is 2*2 or 4. The area of the rug needed to cover the stain will have to be 4*4 or 16. This means that the original rug will need to be dilated by 4 to cover the stain (4 (original) times 4 = 16 (new))

You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
When creating vases for the craft fair, Thomas used the proportion 3 pounds of clay is to 8 vases as 9 pounds of clay is to 24 v
Elodia [21]

Answer:

Answer:

4/24

Step-by-step explanation:

Because 1/6 is 4/24 simplified.

To prove this, all you have to do is try simplifying 4/24 yourself. To do that, we are going to use 4 to divide both the numerator and the denominator because 4 is a common factor of 4 and 24.

(To simplify a fraction, you divide both the numerator and denominator by a common factor)

So 4 divided by 4 is 1, and 24 divided by 4 is 6

1/6

99% sure im right ;)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2 2/5 x 2 = <br><br> 4.8<br> -4.8<br> 8.4<br> -8.4
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

c

Step-by-step explanation:

you have a calculator dont you?

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are sets and Pls give examples​
PilotLPTM [1.2K]
Is a collection of well defined and distinct objects.
Ex: ( A B C D E) all letters
Ex2: ( January, February, March, April) all months
6 0
4 years ago
There are 12 inches in 1 foot. Write 75 inches in feet and inches
mixas84 [53]
84/12 is 7 so it’s 7 feet and to find out how many inches, you have to subtract 84-75 which is 9 that that’s 9 inches

7 feet and 9 inches
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • #16 plz and the answer and<br> Work plz!!!
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone answer this and explain how they got the answer? I am really confused.
    11·1 answer
  • If one fourth of a 30 gallon pool is filled in 5 minutes how long will it take for four fourths to be filled
    10·2 answers
  • Your family visited Disney World Orlando, FL. The 823.5 mile trip took 11.5 hours. How fast did your family travel?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following SRS designs will give the most precision (smallest standard error) for estimating a population mean? Assu
    13·1 answer
  • Two-digit numbers are formed from the digits 1, 6, and 7. Find the sample spaxe
    8·1 answer
  • Please HELPPP!!!<br> Pleaseeeee
    6·1 answer
  • If the complement of an angle is equal to the supplement of four times the angle, then find the measure of the angle.
    9·1 answer
  • Jeremy, Carlos, Vincent, and Justin shared a pizza for lunch. Vincent ate half the amount that Carlos did. Jeremy ate four times
    7·1 answer
  • What is an equation of the line that passes through the points <br>(6,5) and (3,5)?​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!